These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37093509)

  • 21. The Emerging Role of Robotic Single-site Approach for Myomectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Giovannopoulou E; Prodromidou A; Blontzos N; Iavazzo C
    Surg Innov; 2021 Jun; 28(3):352-359. PubMed ID: 33555235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Barbed Sutures Compared With Conventional Sutures During Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Kathopoulis N; Prodromidou A; Douligeris A; Diakosavvas M; Zacharakis D; Kypriotis K; Chatzipapas I; Grigoriadis T; Protopapas A
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 144(4):e81-e100. PubMed ID: 39146537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Single-Site Robotic Myomectomy without Accessory Instrument Compared with Two-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
    Kim JH; Lee EJ
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2022; 87(1):70-78. PubMed ID: 35231906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison between reduced-port robotic surgery and multiport robot-assisted laparoscopy for myomectomy.
    Nam SH; Paek J; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jun; 213():53-57. PubMed ID: 28426944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Feasibility of Reduced-Port Robotic Surgery for Myomectomy with the da Vinci Surgical System.
    Kim JJ; Choi C; Nam SH; Kim WY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):926-931. PubMed ID: 28487176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The great debate: Surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus laparotomic myomectomy. A meta-analysis to critically evaluate current evidence and look over the horizon.
    Giannini A; Cuccu I; D'Auge TG; De Angelis E; Laganà AS; Chiantera V; Caserta D; Vitale SG; Muzii L; D'Oria O; Perniola G; Bogani G; Di Donato V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 Jun; 297():50-58. PubMed ID: 38581885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparoscopic myomectomy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis.
    Sheng Y; Hong Z; Wang J; Mao B; Wu Z; Gou Y; Zhao J; Liu Q
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):230. PubMed ID: 37507735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical outcomes after uterine artery occlusion at the time of myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Sanders AP; Chan WV; Tang J; Murji A
    Fertil Steril; 2019 Apr; 111(4):816-827.e4. PubMed ID: 30661604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy and safety of V-Loc
    Hafermann J; Silas U; Saunders R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 309(4):1249-1265. PubMed ID: 38127141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Laparoscopic myomectomy complications: META analysis on RCTs and review of large cohort studies.
    Tanos V; Lee SC; Alexander K; Pavlou A; Balanos I; Sandhu A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():109-118. PubMed ID: 37302233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Robotic single-site myomectomy: A single-center experience of 101 consecutive cases.
    Kim M; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1959. PubMed ID: 30238688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids.
    Bhave Chittawar P; Franik S; Pouwer AW; Farquhar C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD004638. PubMed ID: 25331441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Robotic vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic myomectomy.
    Sunkara S; Guan X
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Aug; 118(2):414-416. PubMed ID: 35691722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Manual morcellation compared to power morcellation during robotic myomectomy.
    Sanderson DJ; Sanderson R; Cleason D; Seaman C; Ghomi A
    J Robot Surg; 2019 Apr; 13(2):209-214. PubMed ID: 29907929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing single port laparoscopic myomectomy with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy.
    Lee D; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Aug; 239():52-59. PubMed ID: 31181399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perioperative and functional outcomes of single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical cystectomy: evidence-based on controlled studies.
    Wang L; Chen SY; Yang JW; Li KP; Wan S; Li XR; Yang L
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Sep; 18(1):344. PubMed ID: 39312042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Robotic single-site myomectomy: initial report and technique.
    Lewis EI; Srouji SS; Gargiulo AR
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1370-7.e1. PubMed ID: 25792248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
    Song T; Kim TJ; Lee SH; Kim TH; Kim WY
    Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26263079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feasibility and Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Higher Order Myomectomy.
    Leaf MC; Lombardo A; Wainger JJ; Borahay MA; Frost A; Patzkowsky K; Wang KC; Wu H; Simpson K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2024 Oct; 31(10):870-874. PubMed ID: 38705376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.