BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37093820)

  • 1. Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect DNA barcodes from Colombia.
    Baena-Bejarano N; Reina C; Martínez-Revelo DE; Medina CA; Tovar E; Uribe-Soto S; Neita-Moreno JC; Gonzalez MA
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0277379. PubMed ID: 37093820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of BOLD and GenBank - Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials.
    Meiklejohn KA; Damaso N; Robertson JM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217084. PubMed ID: 31216285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. BOLD and GenBank revisited - Do identification errors arise in the lab or in the sequence libraries?
    Pentinsaari M; Ratnasingham S; Miller SE; Hebert PDN
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231814. PubMed ID: 32298363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A DNA barcode survey of insect biodiversity in Pakistan.
    Ashfaq M; Khan AM; Rasool A; Akhtar S; Nazir N; Ahmed N; Manzoor F; Sones J; Perez K; Sarwar G; Khan AA; Akhter M; Saeed S; Sultana R; Tahir HM; Rafi MA; Iftikhar R; Naseem MT; Masood M; Tufail M; Kumar S; Afzal S; McKeown J; Samejo AA; Khaliq I; D'Souza ML; Mansoor S; Hebert PDN
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e13267. PubMed ID: 35497186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guidelines for the Analysis of DNA Barcoding/Metabarcoding Sequencing Data and Interpretation of Publicly Available Databases.
    Damaso N; Elwick KE; Robertson JM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2024; 2744():391-402. PubMed ID: 38683333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sharpening the DNA barcoding tool through a posteriori taxonomic validation: The case of Longitarsus flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).
    Salvi D; Berrilli E; D'Alessandro P; Biondi M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233573. PubMed ID: 32437469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tiny insects, big troubles: a review of BOLD's COI database for Thysanoptera (Insecta).
    Lindner MF; Gonçalves LT; Bianchi FM; Ferrari A; Cavalleri A
    Bull Entomol Res; 2023 Oct; 113(5):703-715. PubMed ID: 37614126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. South Africa's contribution of insect records on the BOLD system.
    Myburgh MM; Thabang Madisha M; Coetzer WG
    Mol Biol Rep; 2021 Dec; 48(12):8211-8220. PubMed ID: 34652616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrative DNA barcoding framework of ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae).
    Huang W; Xie X; Huo L; Liang X; Wang X; Chen X
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):10063. PubMed ID: 32572078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Curation of a reference database of COI sequences for insect identification through DNA metabarcoding: COins.
    Magoga G; Forni G; Brunetti M; Meral A; Spada A; De Biase A; Montagna M
    Database (Oxford); 2022 Jul; 2022():. PubMed ID: 35796594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA barcoding for species assignment: the case of Mediterranean marine fishes.
    Landi M; Dimech M; Arculeo M; Biondo G; Martins R; Carneiro M; Carvalho GR; Lo Brutto S; Costa FO
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106135. PubMed ID: 25222272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Barcoding beetles: a regional survey of 1872 species reveals high identification success and unusually deep interspecific divergences.
    Pentinsaari M; Hebert PD; Mutanen M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108651. PubMed ID: 25255319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A database and checklist of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera) from Colombia.
    Murillo-Ramos L; Sihvonen P; Brehm G; Ríos-Malaver IC; Wahlberg N
    Biodivers Data J; 2021; 9():e68693. PubMed ID: 34566452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Morphological identification and COI barcodes of adult flies help determine species identities of chironomid larvae (Diptera, Chironomidae).
    Failla AJ; Vasquez AA; Hudson P; Fujimoto M; Ram JL
    Bull Entomol Res; 2016 Feb; 106(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 26072670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Wolbachia and DNA barcoding insects: patterns, potential, and problems.
    Smith MA; Bertrand C; Crosby K; Eveleigh ES; Fernandez-Triana J; Fisher BL; Gibbs J; Hajibabaei M; Hallwachs W; Hind K; Hrcek J; Huang DW; Janda M; Janzen DH; Li Y; Miller SE; Packer L; Quicke D; Ratnasingham S; Rodriguez J; Rougerie R; Shaw MR; Sheffield C; Stahlhut JK; Steinke D; Whitfield J; Wood M; Zhou X
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36514. PubMed ID: 22567162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths.
    Wilson JJ; Rougerie R; Schonfeld J; Janzen DH; Hallwachs W; Hajibabaei M; Kitching IJ; Haxaire J; Hebert PD
    BMC Ecol; 2011 Aug; 11():18. PubMed ID: 21806794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Species Identification in Malaise Trap Samples by DNA Barcoding Based on NGS Technologies and a Scoring Matrix.
    Morinière J; Cancian de Araujo B; Lam AW; Hausmann A; Balke M; Schmidt S; Hendrich L; Doczkal D; Fartmann B; Arvidsson S; Haszprunar G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155497. PubMed ID: 27191722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the biodiversity of terrestrial invertebrates on a forested island using DNA barcodes and metabarcoding data.
    Dopheide A; Tooman LK; Grosser S; Agabiti B; Rhode B; Xie D; Stevens MI; Nelson N; Buckley TR; Drummond AJ; Newcomb RD
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jun; 29(4):e01877. PubMed ID: 30811075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Be positive: customized reference databases and new, local barcodes balance false taxonomic assignments in metabarcoding studies.
    Mugnai F; Costantini F; Chenuil A; Leduc M; Gutiérrez Ortega JM; Meglécz E
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14616. PubMed ID: 36643652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A molecular-based identification resource for the arthropods of Finland.
    Roslin T; Somervuo P; Pentinsaari M; Hebert PDN; Agda J; Ahlroth P; Anttonen P; Aspi J; Blagoev G; Blanco S; Chan D; Clayhills T; deWaard J; deWaard S; Elliot T; Elo R; Haapala S; Helve E; Ilmonen J; Hirvonen P; Ho C; Itämies J; Ivanov V; Jakovlev J; Juslén A; Jussila R; Kahanpää J; Kaila L; Jari-PekkaKaitila ; Kakko A; Kakko I; Karhu A; Karjalainen S; Kjaerandsen J; Koskinen J; Laasonen EM; Laasonen L; Laine E; Lampila P; Levesque-Beaudin V; Lu L; Lähteenaro M; Majuri P; Malmberg S; Manjunath R; Martikainen P; Mattila J; McKeown J; Metsälä P; Miklasevskaja M; Miller M; Miskie R; Muinonen A; Veli-MattiMukkala ; Naik S; Nikolova N; Nupponen K; Ovaskainen O; Österblad I; Paasivirta L; Pajunen T; Parkko P; Paukkunen J; Penttinen R; Perez K; Pohjoismäki J; Prosser S; Raekunnas M; Rahulan M; Rannisto M; Ratnasingham S; Raukko P; Rinne A; Rintala T; Miranda Romo S; Salmela J; Salokannel J; Savolainen R; Schulman L; Sihvonen P; Soliman D; Sones J; Steinke C; Ståhls G; Tabell J; Tiusanen M; Várkonyi G; Vesterinen EJ; Viitanen E; Vikberg V; Viitasaari M; Vilen J; Warne C; Wei C; Winqvist K; Zakharov E; Mutanen M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Feb; 22(2):803-822. PubMed ID: 34562055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.