These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37093855)

  • 1. Shape-driven deep neural networks for fast acquisition of aortic 3D pressure and velocity flow fields.
    Pajaziti E; Montalt-Tordera J; Capelli C; Sivera R; Sauvage E; Quail M; Schievano S; Muthurangu V
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2023 Apr; 19(4):e1011055. PubMed ID: 37093855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image2Flow: A proof-of-concept hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network for rapid patient-specific pulmonary artery segmentation and CFD flow field calculation from 3D cardiac MRI data.
    Yao T; Pajaziti E; Quail M; Schievano S; Steeden J; Muthurangu V
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 Jun; 20(6):e1012231. PubMed ID: 38900817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining statistical shape modeling, CFD, and meta-modeling to approximate the patient-specific pressure-drop across the aortic valve in real-time.
    Hoeijmakers MJMM; Waechter-Stehle I; Weese J; Van de Vosse FN
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2020 Oct; 36(10):e3387. PubMed ID: 32686898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of blood flow regularized by 3D phase contrast MRI.
    Rispoli VC; Nielsen JF; Nayak KS; Carvalho JL
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 Nov; 14():110. PubMed ID: 26611470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physics-driven CFD modeling of complex anatomical cardiovascular flows-a TCPC case study.
    Pekkan K; de Zélicourt D; Ge L; Sotiropoulos F; Frakes D; Fogel MA; Yoganathan AP
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2005 Mar; 33(3):284-300. PubMed ID: 15868719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generating wall shear stress for coronary artery in real-time using neural networks: Feasibility and initial results based on idealized models.
    Su B; Zhang JM; Zou H; Ghista D; Le TT; Chin C
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 Nov; 126():104038. PubMed ID: 33039809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inter-Laboratory Characterization of the Velocity Field in the FDA Blood Pump Model Using Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV).
    Hariharan P; Aycock KI; Buesen M; Day SW; Good BC; Herbertson LH; Steinseifer U; Manning KB; Craven BA; Malinauskas RA
    Cardiovasc Eng Technol; 2018 Dec; 9(4):623-640. PubMed ID: 30291585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation on aortic hemodynamics based on physics-informed neural network.
    Du M; Zhang C; Xie S; Pu F; Zhang D; Li D
    Math Biosci Eng; 2023 May; 20(7):11545-11567. PubMed ID: 37501408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical investigation of patient-specific thoracic aortic aneurysms and comparison with normal subject via computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
    Etli M; Canbolat G; Karahan O; Koru M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Jan; 59(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33225424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modified method of computed fluid dynamics simulation in abdominal aorta and visceral arteries.
    Shi Y; Peng C; Liu J; Lan H; Li C; Qin W; Yuan T; Kan Y; Wang S; Fu W
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Nov; 24(15):1718-1729. PubMed ID: 34569360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics.
    Isoda H; Ohkura Y; Kosugi T; Hirano M; Alley MT; Bammer R; Pelc NJ; Namba H; Sakahara H
    Neuroradiology; 2010 Oct; 52(10):913-20. PubMed ID: 19967532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the accuracy of cerebrovascular computational fluid dynamics modeling through time-resolved experimental validation.
    Luisi CA; Witter TL; Nikoubashman O; Wiesmann M; Steinseifer U; Neidlin M
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8194. PubMed ID: 38589554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational Study of Anatomical Risk Factors in Idealized Models of Type B Aortic Dissection.
    Ben Ahmed S; Dillon-Murphy D; Figueroa CA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2016 Dec; 52(6):736-745. PubMed ID: 27561609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of boundary conditions for CFD simulation in human carotid artery.
    Xu P; Liu X; Zhang H; Ghista D; Zhang D; Shi C; Huang W
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Dec; 17(6):1581-1597. PubMed ID: 29982960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of atherosclerotic changes in cavernous carotid aneurysms based on computational fluid dynamics analysis: a proof-of-concept study.
    Nakajima S; Sugiyama S; Oishi H; Sato K; Matsumoto Y; Niizuma K; Fujimura M; Tominaga T
    Neuroradiology; 2022 Mar; 64(3):575-585. PubMed ID: 34505180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconstruction of carotid stenosis hemodynamics based on guidewire pressure data and computational modeling.
    Dinh H; Vinuela F; Szeder V; Khatibi K; Mejia LP; Chien A
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2022 May; 60(5):1253-1268. PubMed ID: 35359199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Haemodynamics in a patient-specific intracranial aneurysm according to experimental and numerical approaches: A comparison of PIV, CFD and PC-MRI.
    Li Y; Yoneyama Y; Isoda H; Terada M; Kosugi T; Kosugi T; Zhang M; Ohta M
    Technol Health Care; 2021; 29(2):253-267. PubMed ID: 32568138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A feasibility study of deep learning for predicting hemodynamics of human thoracic aorta.
    Liang L; Mao W; Sun W
    J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109544. PubMed ID: 31806261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
    Berg P; Roloff C; Beuing O; Voss S; Sugiyama S; Aristokleous N; Anayiotos AS; Ashton N; Revell A; Bressloff NW; Brown AG; Chung BJ; Cebral JR; Copelli G; Fu W; Qiao A; Geers AJ; Hodis S; Dragomir-Daescu D; Nordahl E; Bora Suzen Y; Owais Khan M; Valen-Sendstad K; Kono K; Menon PG; Albal PG; Mierka O; Münster R; Morales HG; Bonnefous O; Osman J; Goubergrits L; Pallares J; Cito S; Passalacqua A; Piskin S; Pekkan K; Ramalho S; Marques N; Sanchi S; Schumacher KR; Sturgeon J; Švihlová H; Hron J; Usera G; Mendina M; Xiang J; Meng H; Steinman DA; Janiga G
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Dec; 137(12):121008. PubMed ID: 26473395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transient wall shear stress estimation in coronary bifurcations using convolutional neural networks.
    Gharleghi R; Sowmya A; Beier S
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107013. PubMed ID: 35901629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.