These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37094516)

  • 1. Improvements, factors, and influences on DNA recovery from firearms.
    Kaesler T; Kirkbride KP; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102873. PubMed ID: 37094516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases.
    Jansson L; Forsberg C; Akel Y; Dufva C; Ansell C; Ansell R; Hedman J
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102343. PubMed ID: 32683317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
    Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. DNA transfer to firearms in alternative realistic handling scenarios.
    Gosch A; Euteneuer J; Preuß-Wössner J; Courts C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102355. PubMed ID: 32707471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PE-Swab Direct STR Amplification of Forensic Touch DNA Samples.
    Liu JY
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):693-701. PubMed ID: 25684449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
    Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of two methods of DNA recovery from fired and unfired 9 mm ammunition.
    Moore D; Beaumont D; Brown M; Clayton T; Coleman K; Subhani Z; Thomson J
    Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):160-169. PubMed ID: 33736848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An improved process for the collection and DNA analysis of fired cartridge cases.
    Bille TW; Fahrig G; Weitz SM; Peiffer GA
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102238. PubMed ID: 32028222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of different methods of DNA recovery and PCR amplification in STR profiling of casings-a retrospective study.
    Radojicic V; Keckarevic Markovic M; Puac F; Kecmanovic M; Keckarevic D
    Int J Legal Med; 2018 Nov; 132(6):1575-1580. PubMed ID: 29536195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trace DNA Sampling Success from Evidence Items Commonly Encountered in Forensic Casework.
    Dziak R; Peneder A; Buetter A; Hageman C
    J Forensic Sci; 2018 May; 63(3):835-841. PubMed ID: 28921603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
    Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collecting touch DNA from glass surfaces using different sampling solutions and volumes: Immediate and storage effects on genetic STR analysis.
    Schulte J; Rittiner N; Seiberle I; Kron S; Schulz I
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 Jul; 68(4):1133-1147. PubMed ID: 37282776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review.
    Tozzo P; Mazzobel E; Marcante B; Delicati A; Caenazzo L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Dec; 23(24):. PubMed ID: 36555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swabbing firearms for handler's DNA.
    Richert NJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jul; 56(4):972-5. PubMed ID: 21470231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic study for DNA recovery and profiling from common IED substrates: From laboratory to casework.
    Phetpeng S; Kitpipit T; Thanakiatkrai P
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():53-60. PubMed ID: 25828367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
    Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.