141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37094523)
1. The ethics of risk-stratified cancer screening.
Dennison RA; Usher-Smith JA; John SD
Eur J Cancer; 2023 Jul; 187():1-6. PubMed ID: 37094523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing risk-stratified screening for common cancers: a review of potential ethical, legal and social issues.
Hall AE; Chowdhury S; Hallowell N; Pashayan N; Dent T; Pharoah P; Burton H
J Public Health (Oxf); 2014 Jun; 36(2):285-91. PubMed ID: 23986542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for early detection of cancer--ethical aspects.
Törnberg SA
Acta Oncol; 1999; 38(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 10090692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What ethical and legal principles should guide the genotyping of children as part of a personalised screening programme for common cancer?
Hall AE; Chowdhury S; Pashayan N; Hallowell N; Pharoah P; Burton H
J Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 40(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 23454719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethical issues in cancer screening and prevention.
Plutynski A
J Med Philos; 2012 Jun; 37(3):310-23. PubMed ID: 22566586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A community jury study exploring the public acceptability of using risk stratification to determine eligibility for cancer screening.
Dennison RA; Boscott RA; Thomas R; Griffin SJ; Harrison H; John SD; Moorthie SA; Morris S; Rossi SH; Stewart GD; Thomas CV; Usher-Smith JA
Health Expect; 2022 Aug; 25(4):1789-1806. PubMed ID: 35526275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Respect for Autonomy and Dementia Care in Nursing Homes: Revising Beauchamp and Childress's Account of Autonomous Decision-Making.
Soofi H
J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Sep; 19(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 35749025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Women's participation in breast cancer screening in France--an ethical approach.
Moutel G; Duchange N; Darquy S; de Montgolfier S; Papin-Lefebvre F; Jullian O; Viguier J; Sancho-Garnier H;
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():64. PubMed ID: 25127662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues evolving from patients' perspectives on compulsory screening for syphilis and voluntary screening for cervical cancer in Kenya.
Omondi Aduda DS; Mkhize N
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Mar; 15():27. PubMed ID: 24678613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implementation of risk stratification within bowel cancer screening: a community jury study exploring public acceptability and communication needs.
Taylor LC; Dennison RA; Griffin SJ; John SD; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Thomas CV; Thomas R; Usher-Smith JA
BMC Public Health; 2023 Sep; 23(1):1798. PubMed ID: 37715213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tailored Breast Screening Trial (TBST)].
Paci E; Mantellini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Falini P; Puliti D;
Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(4-5):317-27. PubMed ID: 24293498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception.
Coverdale JH; Bayer TL; McCullough LB; Chervenak FA
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4. PubMed ID: 8354506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reaching targets in the national cervical screening programme: are current practices unethical?
Foster P; Anderson CM
J Med Ethics; 1998 Jun; 24(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 9650108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primum non nocere and the quality of evidence: rethinking the ethics of screening.
Ewart RM
J Am Board Fam Pract; 2000; 13(3):188-96. PubMed ID: 10826867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening.
Schwartz PH; Meslin EM
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Jun; 23(6):867-70. PubMed ID: 18421509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues for cancer screening.
Ustun C; Ceber E
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2003; 4(4):373-6. PubMed ID: 14728598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
