These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37096625)
21. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions. Vernick JS; Rutkow L; Webster DW; Teret SP Am J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 101(11):2021-6. PubMed ID: 21940936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Public Good on the Docket - The Supreme Court's Evolving Approach to Public Health. Sharfstein JM; Gostin LO N Engl J Med; 2024 May; 390(18):1637-1639. PubMed ID: 38657241 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Institutional hybridity and policy-motivated reasoning structure public evaluations of the Supreme Court. Gadarian SK; Strother L PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0294525. PubMed ID: 37992008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science. Haack S Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion and the law: the impact on hospital policy of the Roe and Doe decisions. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW J Health Polit Policy Law; 1976; 1(3):319-37. PubMed ID: 1022805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action. Wiist WH Am J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 101(7):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21421946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences. Koslov TI Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(3):243-8. PubMed ID: 1434769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Legal Challenge of Abortion Stigma-and Government Restrictions on the Practice of Medicine. Fox D Hastings Cent Rep; 2020 Mar; 50(2):13-15. PubMed ID: 32311137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry. Appelbaum PS Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court. Sirovich L Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Jun; 100(13):7432-7. PubMed ID: 12821777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abortion and the search for public policy. McIntyre RL Trends Health Care Law Ethics; 1993; 8(3):7-16. PubMed ID: 8118140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's COVID-Free Exercise Cases. Parmet WE J Law Med Ethics; 2021; 49(4):564-579. PubMed ID: 35006053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Implications of the Supreme Court's ACA Medicaid decision. Perkins J J Law Med Ethics; 2013 Mar; 41 Suppl 1():77-9. PubMed ID: 23590747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Justice blocks and predictability of U.S. Supreme Court votes. GuimerĂ R; Sales-Pardo M PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27188. PubMed ID: 22096533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Judicial hierarchy and discursive influence. Herron F; Carlson K; Rockmore DN; Livermore MA Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2024 Apr; 382(2270):20230145. PubMed ID: 38403059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]