These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37096807)
1. Comparison of postoperative urinary continence and incontinence types between conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Makino T; Naito R; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Neurourol Urodyn; 2023 Aug; 42(6):1411-1420. PubMed ID: 37096807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Retzius-sparing Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Leads to Durable Improvement in Urinary Function and Quality of Life Versus Standard Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Without Compromise on Oncologic Efficacy: Single-surgeon Series and Step-by-step Guide. Egan J; Marhamati S; Carvalho FLF; Davis M; O'Neill J; Lee H; Lynch JH; Hankins RA; Hu JC; Kowalczyk KJ Eur Urol; 2021 Jun; 79(6):839-857. PubMed ID: 32536488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative functional and cancer control evaluation of conventional and Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Comparison of selected cases by propensity score matching. Kadono Y; Nohara T; Kawaguchi S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Yaegashi H; Iijima M; Shigehara K; Izumi K; Mizokami A Prostate; 2023 Jun; 83(8):773-780. PubMed ID: 36879364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Dalela D; Jeong W; Prasad MA; Sood A; Abdollah F; Diaz M; Karabon P; Sammon J; Jamil M; Baize B; Simone A; Menon M Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):677-685. PubMed ID: 28483330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparative study with 19-month follow-up. Abdel Raheem A; Hagras A; Ghaith A; Alenzi MJ; Elghiaty A; Gameel T; Alowidah I; Ham WS; Choi YD; El-Bahnasy AH; Omar A; El-Bendary M; Rha KH Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2020 Oct; 72(5):586-594. PubMed ID: 32748620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A propensity score-matching study on retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Evidence of continence advantage on the early learning curve. Yee CH; Liu AQ; Chiu PKF; Teoh JYC; Hou SSM; Ng CF Asian J Surg; 2022 Jul; 45(7):1403-1407. PubMed ID: 34690053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of Retzius-sparing versus conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A KSER update series systematic review and meta-analysis. Chung DY; Jung HD; Kim DK; Lee MH; Lee SW; Paick S; Lee JY; Jeon SH PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268182. PubMed ID: 35617274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retzius-sparing technique independently predicts early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kadhim H; Ang KM; Tan WS; Nathan A; Pavan N; Mazzon G; Al-Kadhi O; Di G; Dinneen E; Briggs T; Kelkar A; Rajan P; Nathan S; Kelly JD; Sooriakumaran P; Sridhar A J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1419-1426. PubMed ID: 35192106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Barakat B; Othman H; Gauger U; Wolff I; Hadaschik B; Rehme C Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jul; 8(4):1060-1071. PubMed ID: 34429272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Retzius-sparing versus standard robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Tahra A; Sen UT; Sobay R; İnkaya A; Kucuk EV; Boylu U Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 Jun; 46(5):293-300. PubMed ID: 35221232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic Anatomical Features After Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Intended for Early Recovery of Urinary Symptoms. Ota Y; Hamamoto S; Matsuyama N; Hamakawa T; Iwatsuki S; Etani T; Taguchi K; Naiki T; Ando R; Nakane A; Okada A; Kawai N; Kubota Y; Yasui T J Endourol; 2021 Mar; 35(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 32935558 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Outcomes of Salvage Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robotic Prostatectomy: An International, Multi-Surgeon Series. Kowalczyk KJ; Madi RH; Eden CG; Sooriakumaran P; Fransis K; Raskin Y; Joniau S; Johnson S; Jacobsohn K; Galfano A; Bocciardi AM; Hwang J; Kim IY; Hu JC J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1184-1191. PubMed ID: 34181471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical and functional outcomes of Retzius-sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus conventional robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. Are outcomes worth it? Systematic review and meta-analysis. O'Connor-Cordova MA; Macías AGO; Sancen-Herrera JP; Altamirano-Lamarque F; Vargas Del Toro A; Peddinani BK; Canal-Zarate P; O'Connor-Juarez MA Prostate; 2023 Nov; 83(15):1395-1414. PubMed ID: 37555617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence, voiding symptoms and quality of life after open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Geraerts I; Van Poppel H; Devoogdt N; Van Cleynenbreugel B; Joniau S; Van Kampen M BJU Int; 2013 Nov; 112(7):936-43. PubMed ID: 23937206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Longitudinal change of comprehensive lower urinary tract symptoms and various types of urinary incontinence during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Fujimura T; Igawa Y; Aizawa N; Niimi A; Yamada Y; Sugihara T; Kamei J; Sato Y; Matsunaga A; Yoshida M; Shinoda Y; Fukuhara H; Nakagawa T; Homma Y; Kume H Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Apr; 38(4):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 30995359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Early Urinary Continence, Oncological Outcomes, and Postoperative Complications in Retzius-Sparing and Standard Approach Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Yılmaz K; Ölçücü MT; Özsoy Ç; Aksaray EE; Kılıç Ş; Ateş M J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Feb; 33(2):150-154. PubMed ID: 36257651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Can nerve monitoring during radical prostatectomy improve functional outcomes? A randomised trial. Nolsøe AB; Østergren PB; Jakobsen H; Jensen CFS; Bruun NH; Sønksen J; Fode M BJU Int; 2024 Jun; 133(6):742-751. PubMed ID: 38348547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal, 5-year long-term outcomes for urinary continence and quality of life after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japanese patients. Hikita K; Honda M; Shimizu R; Teraoka S; Kawamoto B; Yumioka T; Tsounapi P; Iwamoto H; Morizane S; Takenaka A Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2022 May; 14(3):178-185. PubMed ID: 34856645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence. Kadono Y; Ueno S; Kadomoto S; Iwamoto H; Takezawa Y; Nakashima K; Nohara T; Izumi K; Mizokami A; Gabata T; Namiki M Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Nov; 35(8):1034-1039. PubMed ID: 26352154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]