These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37097551)

  • 1. Nationwide survey on the current situation of quality control of diagnostic displays in Japan.
    Yasuda T; Maeda K; Ogoshi D; Kanesaki M; Takano H; Nishikawa K
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2023 Jun; 16(2):325-337. PubMed ID: 37097551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation of quality control and average glandular dose and image quality in digital mammography in Hokkaido].
    Kurowarabi K; Abe H; Horita H; Kaneta K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 21532248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PERCEPTION OF QUALITY CONTROL BY PERSONNEL IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY FACILITIES IN AKWA IBOM STATE, NIGERIA.
    Inyang SO; Essien IE; Egbe NO
    Niger J Med; 2015; 24(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 27487613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CHALLENGES IN SETTING UP QUALITY CONTROL IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY FACILITIES IN NIGERIA.
    Inyang SO; Egbe NO; Ekpo E
    Niger J Med; 2015; 24(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 27487612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the present status of quality assurance program implementation in digital mammography facilities in a developing country.
    Gonzalez-Ruiz A; Sánchez Mendoza HI; Santos Cuevas CL; Isidro-Ortega FJ; Estrada JF; Domínguez-García MV; Flores-Merino MV
    J Radiol Prot; 2022 Nov; 42(4):. PubMed ID: 36347024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Studies on the Effectiveness of High-luminance Monitors in Mammography Softcopy Interpretation].
    Shinohara N; Hatanaka M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1249-1255. PubMed ID: 37704420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigation of actual conditions of mammography in Kagoshima Prefecture.
    Baba N; Tanimoto E; Kobayashi Y; Kuma K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Nov; 65(11):1526-33. PubMed ID: 20019433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eight years of quality control in Bulgaria: impact on mammography practice.
    Avramova-Cholakova S; Lilkov G; Kaneva M; Terziev K; Nakov I; Mutkurov N; Kovacheva D; Ivanova M; Vasilev D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):359-62. PubMed ID: 25836697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bulgarian experience in the establishment of reference dose levels and implementation of a quality control system in diagnostic radiology.
    Vassileva J; Dimov A; Slavchev A; Karadjov A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):131-4. PubMed ID: 16464832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement in mammography quality control: 1987-1995.
    Hendrick RE; Chrvala CA; Plott CM; Cutter GR; Jessop NW; Wilcox-Buchalla P
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 9609888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries.
    Hendrick RE; Klabunde C; Grivegnee A; Pou G; Ballard-Barbash R
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Jun; 14(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 12108532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Current situations and problems of quality control for medical imaging display systems].
    Shibutani T; Setojima T; Ueda K; Takada K; Okuno T; Onoguchi M; Nakajima T; Fujisawa I
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Apr; 71(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 25892423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Imaging acquisition display performance: an evaluation and discussion of performance metrics and procedures.
    Silosky MS; Marsh RM; Scherzinger AL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):334-341. PubMed ID: 27455501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fact-finding survey on the competencies and literacy of radiological technologists regarding radiation disasters.
    Arai T; Murata S; Watanabe Y; Ishihara T; Fukamizu Y; Takeda S; Ebata K; Watanabe Y; Takashima Y; Kaneko J
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(2):237-245. PubMed ID: 36591695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Technical Performance Assessment and Quality Control of Ultrasound Device Monitors.
    Vuorenmaa A; Siitama E; Hakulinen U; Eskola H
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):380-387. PubMed ID: 36280444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proposed diagnostic reference levels for general radiography and mammography in Japan.
    Asada Y; Kondo Y; Kobayashi M; Kobayashi K; Ichikawa T; Matsunaga Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):867-876. PubMed ID: 32590370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
    Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implementation of quality assurance in diagnostic radiology in Bosnia and Herzegovina (Republic of Srpska).
    Bosnjak J; Ciraj-Bjelac O; Strbac B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):249-52. PubMed ID: 18283063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.