162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37097987)
1. Comparison of Three Different Devices for the Evaluation of Axial Length, Refractive Error, and Keratometry.
Hessler P; Künzel P; Degle S
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Aug; 100(8):557-563. PubMed ID: 37097987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing ocular biometry and autorefraction measurements from the Myopia Master with the IOLMaster 700 and the Huvitz HRK-8000A autorefractor.
Pedersen HR; Svarverud E; Hagen LA; Gilson SJ; Baraas RC
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 May; 43(3):410-417. PubMed ID: 36734669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraocular lens power measured by partial coherence interferometry.
Hsieh YT; Wang IJ
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1697-701. PubMed ID: 23147857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of axial length, keratometry, and refractive measurement with Myopia Master in children with ametropia.
Ye Y; Zhao Y; Han T; Zhang X; Miao H; Qin B; Zhou X
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):468. PubMed ID: 36463113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters.
Özyol P; Özyol E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():73-78. PubMed ID: 27320057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and Precision of New Optical Biometer Designed for Myopia Management in Measurement of Ocular Biometry.
Chamarty S; Verkicharla PK
Optom Vis Sci; 2023 Nov; 100(11):745-750. PubMed ID: 37889981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.
Aksoy M; Asena L; Güngör SG; Küçüködük A; Akman A
Int Ophthalmol; 2021 Jun; 41(6):2205-2212. PubMed ID: 33733281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Optical Biometers Used in Children for Myopia Control.
Mattern AI; Neller K; Devenijn M; Schwahn H; Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Kaymak H
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2023 Nov; 240(11):1306-1313. PubMed ID: 37364606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability and agreement of Scheimpflug-based and swept-source optical biometry measurements.
Sel S; Stange J; Kaiser D; Kiraly L
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):318-322. PubMed ID: 28342729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Keratometry obtained by corneal mapping versus the IOLMaster in the prediction of postoperative refraction in routine cataract surgery.
Dulku S; Smith HB; Antcliff RJ
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013; 41(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 22594695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Agreement in anterior segment measurements between swept-source and Scheimpflug-based optical biometries in keratoconic eyes: a pilot study.
Chalkiadaki E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Giannakis I; Manousakis E; Karmiris E
Ther Adv Ophthalmol; 2022; 14():25158414211063283. PubMed ID: 35387236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Repeatability and agreement of swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry biometers in myopes.
Garcia Ardoy E; Mateos N; Roda L; Torrado Sierra O; Baptista AM; Serra PM
Clin Exp Optom; 2023 Sep; 106(7):783-792. PubMed ID: 36508569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keratometry versus total corneal refractive power: Analysis of measurement repeatability with 5 different devices in normal eyes with low astigmatism.
Fityo S; Bühren J; Shajari M; Kohnen T
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Apr; 42(4):569-76. PubMed ID: 27113880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the Corneal Power Measurements with the TMS4-Topographer, Pentacam HR, IOL Master, and Javal Keratometer.
Dehnavi Z; Khabazkhoob M; Mirzajani A; Jabbarvand M; Yekta A; Jafarzadehpur E
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2015; 22(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 25949084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the Validity of Measurements of Swept-source and Partial Coherence Interferometry Devices in Cataract Patients.
Ghaffari R; Mahmoudzadeh R; Mohammadi SS; Salabati M; Latifi G; Ghassemi H
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):745-750. PubMed ID: 31592957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Suitability of multifunction devices Myah and Myopia Master for monitoring myopia progression in children and adults.
Chow AHY; Mungalsingh MA; Thai D; Selimos Z; Yan SK; Xu H; Jones DA
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jul; 44(5):1017-1030. PubMed ID: 38760986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcome between ANTERION and IOL Master 700.
Panda A; Nanda A; Sahoo K
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 70(5):1594-1598. PubMed ID: 35502033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optical 'dampening' of the refractive error to axial length ratio: implications for outcome measures in myopia control studies.
Cruickshank FE; Logan NS
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):290-297. PubMed ID: 29691929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Agreement between swept-source optical biometry and Scheimpflug-based tomography in eyes with previous myopic refractive surgery.
Karmiris E; Gartaganis PS; Ntravalias T; Manousakis E; Giannakis I; Chalkiadaki E
Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2022; 36(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 36211320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of postoperative refractive outcomes: IOLMaster® versus immersion ultrasound.
Whang WJ; Jung BJ; Oh TH; Byun YS; Joo CK
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2012; 43(6):496-9. PubMed ID: 22869383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
