153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099176)
1. Differentiation of benign versus malignant indistinguishable vertebral compression fractures by different machine learning with MRI-based radiomic features.
Zhang H; Yuan G; Wang C; Zhao H; Zhu K; Guo J; Chen M; Liu H; Yang G; Wang Y; Ma X
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5069-5076. PubMed ID: 37099176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment.
Liu B; Jin Y; Feng S; Yu H; Zhang Y; Li Y
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jul; 33(7):5060-5068. PubMed ID: 37162531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) MR imaging for differentiation of acute benign and neoplastic compression fractures of the spine.
Schmeel FC; Luetkens JA; Enkirch SJ; Feißt A; Endler CH; Schmeel LC; Wagenhäuser PJ; Träber F; Schild HH; Kukuk GM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5001-5009. PubMed ID: 29858641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A 3D Radiomics-Based Artificial Neural Network Model for Benign Versus Malignant Vertebral Compression Fracture Classification in MRI.
Chiari-Correia NS; Nogueira-Barbosa MH; Chiari-Correia RD; Azevedo-Marques PM
J Digit Imaging; 2023 Aug; 36(4):1565-1577. PubMed ID: 37253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Research synthesis: what is the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures? Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Thawait SK; Marcus MA; Morrison WB; Klufas RA; Eng J; Carrino JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(12):E736-44. PubMed ID: 22210011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant versus benign vertebral compression fractures: can we use bone SPECT as a substitute for MR imaging?
Tokuda O; Harada Y; Ueda T; Ohishi Y; Matsunaga N
Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Mar; 32(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 21150808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative evaluation of T2* relaxation times for the differentiation of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures.
Schmeel FC; Luetkens JA; Feißt A; Enkirch SJ; Endler CH; Wagenhäuser PJ; Schmeel LC; Träber F; Schild HH; Kukuk GM
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Nov; 108():59-65. PubMed ID: 30396672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures using conventional CT based on deep transfer learning features and hand-crafted radiomics features.
Zhang J; Liu J; Liang Z; Xia L; Zhang W; Xing Y; Zhang X; Tang G
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Mar; 24(1):165. PubMed ID: 36879285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.
Cho WI; Chang UK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 21214309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Benign versus malignant compression fracture: a diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging.
Pongpornsup S; Wajanawichakorn P; Danchaivijitr N
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jan; 92(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 19260246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shape, texture and statistical features for classification of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures in magnetic resonance images.
Frighetto-Pereira L; Rangayyan RM; Metzner GA; de Azevedo-Marques PM; Nogueira-Barbosa MH
Comput Biol Med; 2016 Jun; 73():147-56. PubMed ID: 27111110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute benign vertebral compression fractures: "see-through sign" on contrast-enhanced MR images.
Lee E; Lee JW; Lee J; Lee GY; Kang WY; Yoo BR; Shin YJ; Ahn JM; Kang HS
Eur Spine J; 2016 Nov; 25(11):3470-3477. PubMed ID: 26538157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures using qualitative and quantitative analysis of a single fast spin echo T2-weighted Dixon sequence.
Bacher S; Hajdu SD; Maeder Y; Dunet V; Hilbert T; Omoumi P
Eur Radiol; 2021 Dec; 31(12):9418-9427. PubMed ID: 34041569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of usual vertebral compression fractures using CT histogram analysis as quantitative biomarkers: A proof-of-principle study.
Lv M; Zhou Z; Tang Q; Xu J; Huang Q; Lu L; Duan S; Zhu J; Li H
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Oct; 131():109264. PubMed ID: 32920220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four prediction models to discriminate benign from malignant vertebral compression fractures according to MRI feature analysis.
Thawait SK; Kim J; Klufas RA; Morrison WB; Flanders AE; Carrino JA; Ohno-Machado L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 23436836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: Comparison and correlation of radiomics and deep learning frameworks based on spinal CT and clinical characteristics.
Duan S; Hua Y; Cao G; Hu J; Cui W; Zhang D; Xu S; Rong T; Liu B
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110899. PubMed ID: 37300935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of vertebral compression fractures in magnetic resonance images using spectral and fractal analysis.
Azevedo-Marques PM; Spagnoli HF; Frighetto-Pereira L; Menezes-Reis R; Metzner GA; Rangayyan RM; Nogueira-Barbosa MH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():723-6. PubMed ID: 26736364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of the Acuity of Vertebral Compression Fractures on CT Using Radiologic and Radiomic Features.
Kim AY; Yoon MA; Ham SJ; Cho YC; Ko Y; Park B; Kim S; Lee E; Lee RW; Chee CG; Lee MH; Lee SH; Chung HW
Acad Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1512-1520. PubMed ID: 34998683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A deep-learning model for identifying fresh vertebral compression fractures on digital radiography.
Chen W; Liu X; Li K; Luo Y; Bai S; Wu J; Chen W; Dong M; Guo D
Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1496-1505. PubMed ID: 34553256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential diagnostic value of
He X; Zhao L; Guo X; Zhao L; Wu J; Huang J; Sun L; Xie C; Chen H
Cancer Manag Res; 2018; 10():2105-2115. PubMed ID: 30050321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
