120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099491)
1. Improving delivery efficiency using spots and energy layers reduction algorithms based on a large momentum acceptance beamline.
Wang W; Liu X; Yang Z; Liao Y; Li P; Zhao R; Qin B
Med Phys; 2023 Aug; 50(8):5189-5200. PubMed ID: 37099491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mixed-size spot scanning with a compact large momentum acceptance superconducting (LMA-SC) gantry beamline for proton therapy.
Wang W; Xu L; Liao Y; Zeng Y; Chen Y; Yu B; Yang Z; Gao H; Qin B
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38688290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous reduction of number of spots and energy layers in intensity modulated proton therapy for rapid spot scanning delivery.
Fu A; Taasti VT; Zarepisheh M
Med Phys; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38657127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization.
van de Water S; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 25823447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility study of multiple-energy Bragg peak proton FLASH on a superconducting gantry with large momentum acceptance.
Zeng Y; Li H; Wang W; Liu X; Qin B; Dai S; Pang B; Liu M; Quan H; Yang K; Chang Y; Yang Z
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2164-2174. PubMed ID: 38169535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shortening delivery times for intensity-modulated proton therapy by reducing the number of proton spots: an experimental verification.
van de Water S; Belosi MF; Albertini F; Winterhalter C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ
Phys Med Biol; 2020 May; 65(9):095008. PubMed ID: 32155594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrated beam orientation and scanning-spot optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy for brain and unilateral head and neck tumors.
Gu W; O'Connor D; Nguyen D; Yu VY; Ruan D; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1338-1350. PubMed ID: 29394454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Energy layer optimization strategies for intensity-modulated proton therapy of lung cancer patients.
Jensen MF; Hoffmann L; Petersen JBB; Møller DS; Alber M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4355-4363. PubMed ID: 30129041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous Reduction of Number of Spots and Energy Layers in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Rapid Spot Scanning Delivery.
Fu A; Taasti VT; Zarepisheh M
ArXiv; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38711432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel energy layer optimization framework for spot-scanning proton arc therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Lyu Q; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(5):2072-2084. PubMed ID: 32040214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical Note: Plan-delivery-time constrained inverse optimization method with minimum-MU-per-energy-layer (MMPEL) for efficient pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Gao H; Clasie B; McDonald M; Langen KM; Liu T; Lin Y
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3892-3897. PubMed ID: 32614472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimum-MU and sparse-energy-layer (MMSEL) constrained inverse optimization method for efficiently deliverable PBS plans.
Lin Y; Clasie B; Liu T; McDonald M; Langen KM; Gao H
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205001. PubMed ID: 31530746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beam properties within the momentum acceptance of a clinical gantry beamline for proton therapy.
Giovannelli AC; Maradia V; Meer D; Safai S; Psoroulas S; Togno M; Bula C; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Fattori G
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1417-1431. PubMed ID: 35041207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) interplay effect evaluation of asymmetric breathing with simultaneous uncertainty considerations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
Shan J; Yang Y; Schild SE; Daniels TB; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5428-5440. PubMed ID: 32964474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linear and nonlinear programming approaches for "worst case dose" and "minmax" robust optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy dose distributions.
Zaghian M; Cao W; Liu W; Kardar L; Randeniya S; Mohan R; Lim G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):15-25. PubMed ID: 28300378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.
Cao W; Lim GJ; Lee A; Li Y; Liu W; Ronald Zhu X; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5248-56. PubMed ID: 22894449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prioritized efficiency optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Müller BS; Wilkens JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8249-8265. PubMed ID: 27811403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy with different dose delivery techniques.
Liu W; Li Y; Li X; Cao W; Zhang X
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3089-101. PubMed ID: 22755694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robust optimization to reduce the impact of biological effect variation from physical uncertainties in intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Bai X; Lim G; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Cao W
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 64(2):025004. PubMed ID: 30523932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
