These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099726)

  • 1. Relative Efficacy of Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty Devices and Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Pathology: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Zavras AG; Federico VP; Butler AJ; Nolte MT; Dandu N; Phillips FM; Colman MW
    Global Spine J; 2024 Jan; 14(1):322-346. PubMed ID: 37099726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.
    Garrido BJ; Taha TA; Sasso RC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):367-71. PubMed ID: 20087223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
    Loumeau TP; Darden BV; Kesman TJ; Odum SM; Van Doren BA; Laxer EB; Murrey DB
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jul; 25(7):2263-70. PubMed ID: 26869078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal assessment of segmental motion of the cervical spine following total disc arthroplasty: a comparative analysis of devices.
    Colman MW; Zavras AG; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Butler AJ; Singh K; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Oct; 37(4):556-562. PubMed ID: 35426820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective, Randomized Comparison of One-level Mobi-C Cervical Total Disc Replacement vs. Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Results at 5-year Follow-up.
    Hisey MS; Zigler JE; Jackson R; Nunley PD; Bae HW; Kim KD; Ohnmeiss DD
    Int J Spine Surg; 2016; 10():10. PubMed ID: 27162712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.
    Radcliff K; Davis RJ; Hisey MS; Nunley PD; Hoffman GA; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Albert T; Coric D
    Int J Spine Surg; 2017; 11(4):31. PubMed ID: 29372135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective, multicenter clinical trial comparing M6-C compressible six degrees of freedom cervical disc with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level degenerative cervical radiculopathy: 2-year results of an FDA investigational device exemption study.
    Phillips FM; Coric D; Sasso R; Lanman T; Lavelle W; Blumenthal S; Lauryssen C; Guyer R; Albert T; Zigler J; Cammisa F; Milam RA
    Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):239-252. PubMed ID: 33096243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months.
    Gornet MF; Lanman TH; Burkus JK; Hodges SD; McConnell JR; Dryer RF; Copay AG; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):653-667. PubMed ID: 28304237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Five-year clinical results of cervical total disc replacement compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption clinical trial.
    Radcliff K; Coric D; Albert T
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):213-24. PubMed ID: 27015130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors affecting reoperations after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion within and outside of a Federal Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical disc replacement trial.
    Singh K; Phillips FM; Park DK; Pelton MA; An HS; Goldberg EJ
    Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22425784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical total disc replacement with the Mobi-C cervical artificial disc compared with anterior discectomy and fusion for treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial: clinical article.
    Davis RJ; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Hoffman GA; Bae HW; Gaede SE; Rashbaum RF; Nunley PD; Peterson DL; Stokes JK
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Nov; 19(5):532-45. PubMed ID: 24010901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.
    Davis RJ; Nunley PD; Kim KD; Hisey MS; Jackson RJ; Bae HW; Hoffman GA; Gaede SE; Danielson GO; Gordon C; Stone MB
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jan; 22(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25380538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and safety of Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion in patients with symptomatic degenerative disc disease: A meta-analysis.
    Lu H; Peng L
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(49):e8504. PubMed ID: 29245217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical disc arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device exemption study.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Shaffrey ME; Argires PJ; Nian H; Harrell FE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):558-573. PubMed ID: 26230424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus Prodisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial.
    Kelly MP; Mok JM; Frisch RF; Tay BK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jul; 36(15):1171-9. PubMed ID: 21217449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Solid radiographic fusion with a nonconstrained device 5 years after cervical arthroplasty.
    Heary RF; Goldstein IM; Getto KM; Agarwal N
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):951-5. PubMed ID: 25303618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a meta-analysis based on prospective randomized controlled trials.
    Wu AM; Xu H; Mullinix KP; Jin HM; Huang ZY; Lv QB; Wang S; Xu HZ; Chi YL
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Apr; 94(15):e665. PubMed ID: 25881841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study.
    Zigler JE; Delamarter R; Murrey D; Spivak J; Janssen M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Feb; 38(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 23080427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective, randomized, multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex|C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with a minimum 2-year follow-up: clinical article.
    Coric D; Nunley PD; Guyer RD; Musante D; Carmody CN; Gordon CR; Lauryssen C; Ohnmeiss DD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Oct; 15(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 21699471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective study of cervical arthroplasty in 98 patients involved in 1 of 3 separate investigational device exemption studies from a single investigational site with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Clinical article.
    Coric D; Cassis J; Carew JD; Boltes MO
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Dec; 13(6):715-21. PubMed ID: 21121748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.