BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099885)

  • 1. Forensic odontology: Wrong convictions, "bad apples" and "the innocence files".
    Salazar-Aguilar P; Zaror-Sánchez C; Fonseca GM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2023 May; 96():102528. PubMed ID: 37099885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science.
    Espinoza-Silva PV; López-Lázaro S; Fonseca GM
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2023 Jun; 19(2):224-235. PubMed ID: 35781622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wrongful convictions and claims of false or misleading forensic evidence.
    Morgan J
    J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):908-961. PubMed ID: 36946413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seven hundred seventy eight bite marks: analysis by anatomic location, victim and biter demographics, type of crime, and legal disposition.
    Freeman AJ; Senn DR; Arendt DM
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Nov; 50(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 16382842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inconsistency in opinions of forensic odontologists when considering bite mark evidence.
    Reesu GV; Brown NL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Sep; 266():263-270. PubMed ID: 27344263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Review of a forensic pseudoscience: Identification of criminals from bitemark patterns.
    Bowers CM
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Feb; 61():34-39. PubMed ID: 30447642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The genetics of innocence: analysis of 194 U.S. DNA exonerations.
    Hampikian G; West E; Akselrod O
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2011; 12():97-120. PubMed ID: 21721941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bite marks: To opine or not to opine?
    Nittis M; Bassed R
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2024 May; 104():102689. PubMed ID: 38759480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forensic bitemark identification: weak foundations, exaggerated claims.
    Saks MJ; Albright T; Bohan TL; Bierer BE; Bowers CM; Bush MA; Bush PJ; Casadevall A; Cole SA; Denton MB; Diamond SS; Dioso-Villa R; Epstein J; Faigman D; Faigman L; Fienberg SE; Garrett BL; Giannelli PC; Greely HT; Imwinkelried E; Jamieson A; Kafadar K; Kassirer JP; Koehler J'; Korn D; Mnookin J; Morrison AB; Murphy E; Peerwani N; Peterson JL; Risinger DM; Sensabaugh GF; Spiegelman C; Stern H; Thompson WC; Wayman JL; Zabell S; Zumwalt RE
    J Law Biosci; 2016 Dec; 3(3):538-575. PubMed ID: 28852538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bite mark evidence: increasing acceptance with a qualified expert witness. American Board of Forensic Odontology.
    Whatmough LN; Nuckles DB
    Leg Med; 1992; ():49-78. PubMed ID: 1306284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current State of Forensic Science Improvement in the United States: Lessons from Wrongful Convictions.
    Morgan JS
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2024 Jan; 36(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 38297426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
    Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks.
    Pretty IA; Sweet D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):38-44. PubMed ID: 20434861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reality bites--A ten-year retrospective analysis of bitemark casework in Australia.
    Page M; Taylor J; Blenkin M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Mar; 216(1-3):82-7. PubMed ID: 21930355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Forensic Dentist: An Overview of Expert Roles in Animal Bite-Mark Investigations.
    Cohrn K; Berman R
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Jun; 43(6):321-30. PubMed ID: 26126348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application Status and Prospect of Bite Mark Evidence in Forensic Odontology.
    Ma XF; Jin M; Sun H; Mi CB
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 36(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 32705852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of forensic odontology in the identification of victims of major mass disasters across the world: A systematic review.
    Prajapati G; Sarode SC; Sarode GS; Shelke P; Awan KH; Patil S
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199791. PubMed ID: 29953497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lawyers' reasoning and scientific proof: a cautionary tale in forensic odontology.
    Gundelach A
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1989 Jun; 7(2):11-6. PubMed ID: 2639876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Identification from bite marks].
    Schulz P
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Feb; 35(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 6931762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.