These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099918)

  • 1. Computational modeling of braided venous stents - Effect of design features and device-tissue interaction on stent performance.
    Ubachs R; van der Sluis O; Smith S; Mertens J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105857. PubMed ID: 37099918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-objective design optimization of bioresorbable braided stents.
    Carbonaro D; Lucchetti A; Audenino AL; Gries T; Vaughan TJ; Chiastra C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Dec; 242():107781. PubMed ID: 37683458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Numerical investigations of the mechanical properties of braided vascular stents.
    Fu W; Xia Q; Yan R; Qiao A
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(1):81-94. PubMed ID: 29254075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A finite element investigation on design parameters of bare and polymer-covered self-expanding wire braided stents.
    McKenna CG; Vaughan TJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Mar; 115():104305. PubMed ID: 33454463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Analytical methods for braided stents design and comparison with FEA.
    Zaccaria A; Pennati G; Petrini L
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Jul; 119():104560. PubMed ID: 33930655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Numerical modeling of bare and polymer-covered braided stents using torsional and tensile springs connectors.
    Giuliodori A; Hernández JA; Fernandez-Sanchez D; Galve I; Soudah E
    J Biomech; 2021 Jun; 123():110459. PubMed ID: 34022531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of computational modelling techniques for braided stent analysis.
    Kelly N; McGrath DJ; Sweeney CA; Kurtenbach K; Grogan JA; Jockenhoevel S; O'Brien BJ; Bruzzi M; McHugh PE
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 Dec; 22(16):1334-1344. PubMed ID: 31502888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Looped ends versus open ends braided stent: A comparison of the mechanical behaviour using analytical and numerical methods.
    Shanahan C; Tiernan P; Tofail SAM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():581-591. PubMed ID: 28863400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An experimental evaluation of the mechanics of bare and polymer-covered self-expanding wire braided stents.
    McKenna CG; Vaughan TJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103549. PubMed ID: 31783281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual optimization of self-expandable braided wire stents.
    De Beule M; Van Cauter S; Mortier P; Van Loo D; Van Impe R; Verdonck P; Verhegghe B
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 19117791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical modeling of self-expandable stent fabricated using braiding technology.
    Kim JH; Kang TJ; Yu WR
    J Biomech; 2008 Nov; 41(15):3202-12. PubMed ID: 18804764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An experimental investigation of the mechanical performance of PLLA wire-braided stents.
    Lucchetti A; Emonts C; Idrissi A; Gries T; Vaughan TJ
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Feb; 138():105568. PubMed ID: 36459705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational modeling of braided-stent deployment for interpreting the mechanism of stent flattening.
    Shiozaki S; Otani T; Fujimura S; Takao H; Wada S
    Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 37(12):e3335. PubMed ID: 32212324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in silico biomechanical analysis of the stent-esophagus interaction.
    Peirlinck M; Debusschere N; Iannaccone F; Siersema PD; Verhegghe B; Segers P; De Beule M
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Feb; 17(1):111-131. PubMed ID: 28819758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design optimization of stent and its dilatation balloon using kriging surrogate model.
    Li H; Liu T; Wang M; Zhao D; Qiao A; Wang X; Gu J; Li Z; Zhu B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Jan; 16(1):13. PubMed ID: 28086895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparative reliability and performance study of different stent designs in terms of mechanical properties: foreshortening, recoil, radial force, and flexibility.
    Kim DB; Choi H; Joo SM; Kim HK; Shin JH; Hwang MH; Choi J; Kim DG; Lee KH; Lim CH; Yoo SK; Lee HM; Sun K
    Artif Organs; 2013 Apr; 37(4):368-79. PubMed ID: 23461583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finite element analysis and stent design: Reduction of dogboning.
    De Beule M; Van Impe R; Verhegghe B; Segers P; Verdonck P
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):233-41. PubMed ID: 17065746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design method of self-expanding stents suitable for the patient's condition.
    Yoshino D; Inoue K
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(9):1019-38. PubMed ID: 21053768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents.
    Tambaca J; Canic S; Kosor M; Fish RD; Paniagua D
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2011; 38(5):491-501. PubMed ID: 22163122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Finite element simulation and testing of cobalt-chromium stent: a parametric study on radial strength, recoil, foreshortening, and dogboning.
    Kumar A; Bhatnagar N
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):245-259. PubMed ID: 33021106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.