These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37099998)

  • 41. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
    Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Driving while using a smartphone-based mobility application: Evaluating the impact of three multi-choice user interfaces on visual-manual distraction.
    Louveton N; McCall R; Koenig V; Avanesov T; Engel T
    Appl Ergon; 2016 May; 54():196-204. PubMed ID: 26851479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Smartwatches are more distracting than mobile phones while driving: Results from an experimental study.
    Brodeur M; Ruer P; Léger PM; Sénécal S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105846. PubMed ID: 33181456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A meta-analysis of in-vehicle and nomadic voice-recognition system interaction and driving performance.
    Simmons SM; Caird JK; Steel P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Sep; 106():31-43. PubMed ID: 28554063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparing the demands of destination entry using Google Glass and the Samsung Galaxy S4 during simulated driving.
    Beckers N; Schreiner S; Bertrand P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jan; 58():25-34. PubMed ID: 27633195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile.
    Strayer DL; Turrill J; Cooper JM; Coleman JR; Medeiros-Ward N; Biondi F
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1300-24. PubMed ID: 26534847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The risk of a safety-critical event associated with mobile device use in specific driving contexts.
    Fitch GM; Hanowski RJ; Guo F
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 24896192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Demmel S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():253-262. PubMed ID: 29653674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates.
    Kountouriotis GK; Spyridakos P; Carsten OMJ; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():39-45. PubMed ID: 27497055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Distractions by work-related activities: The impact of ride-hailing app and radio system on male taxi drivers.
    Chen T; Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Sze NN; Chen S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106849. PubMed ID: 36209681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of the visual-manual resources required to perform calling and navigation tasks in conventional mode with a portable phone and in full- touch mode with an embedded system.
    Fu R; Zhao X; Li Z; Zhao C; Wang C
    Ergonomics; 2023 Oct; 66(10):1633-1651. PubMed ID: 36533714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Voice messaging while driving: Effects on driving performance and attention.
    Monzer D; Abou Ali A; Abou-Zeid M; Moacdieh NM
    Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103692. PubMed ID: 35065427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Mental workload accumulation effect of mobile phone distraction in L2 autopilot mode.
    Zhao H; Ma J; Zhang Y; Chang R
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):16856. PubMed ID: 36207431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Eye movements in real and simulated driving and navigation control - Foreword to the Special Issue.
    Groner R; Kasneci E
    J Eye Mov Res; 2021 Jun; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 34122742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The smartphone and the driver's cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft's intelligent personal assistants.
    Strayer DL; Cooper JM; Turrill J; Coleman JR; Hopman RJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2017 Jun; 71(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 28604047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A field study on the impact of variations in shortterm memory demands on drivers' visual attention and driving performance across three age groups.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Wang Y; Coughlin JF
    Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):454-68. PubMed ID: 22768646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of Strategies for Integrated Classification of Visual-Manual and Cognitive Distractions in Driving.
    Zhang Y; Kaber D
    Hum Factors; 2016 Sep; 58(6):944-58. PubMed ID: 27164942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Age-Related Differences in the Cognitive, Visual, and Temporal Demands of In-Vehicle Information Systems.
    Cooper JM; Wheatley CL; McCarty MM; Motzkus CJ; Lopes CL; Erickson GG; Baucom BRW; Horrey WJ; Strayer DL
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1154. PubMed ID: 32581959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. "It is frustrating to not have control even though I know it's not legal!": A mixed-methods investigation on applications to prevent mobile phone use while driving.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Truelove V; King M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Mar; 137():105412. PubMed ID: 32006729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Drivers' gap acceptance behaviours at intersections: A driving simulator study to understand the impact of mobile phone visual-manual interactions.
    Li X; Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Rakotonirainy A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Apr; 138():105486. PubMed ID: 32109686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.