These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37100010)

  • 1. Simple manipulations of anthropomorphism fail to induce perceptions of humanness or improve trust in an automated agent.
    Cockram L; Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Sep; 111():104027. PubMed ID: 37100010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Little Anthropomorphism Goes a Long Way.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; Goodyear K; Lu L; O'Hara M; Lee MR; Parasuraman R; Krueger F
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):116-133. PubMed ID: 28146673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults.
    Pak R; Fink N; Price M; Bass B; Sturre L
    Ergonomics; 2012; 55(9):1059-72. PubMed ID: 22799560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to improve pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles: new road infrastructure, external human-machine interface with anthropomorphism, or conventional road signaling?
    Bonneviot F; Coeugnet S; Brangier E
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1129341. PubMed ID: 37213373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents.
    de Visser EJ; Monfort SS; McKendrick R; Smith MA; McKnight PE; Krueger F; Parasuraman R
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2016 Sep; 22(3):331-49. PubMed ID: 27505048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neural Correlates of Variations in Human Trust in Human-like Machines during Non-reciprocal Interactions.
    Jung ES; Dong SY; Lee SY
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jul; 9(1):9975. PubMed ID: 31292474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Not All Information Is Equal: Effects of Disclosing Different Types of Likelihood Information on Trust, Compliance and Reliance, and Task Performance in Human-Automation Teaming.
    Du N; Huang KY; Yang XJ
    Hum Factors; 2020 Sep; 62(6):987-1001. PubMed ID: 31348863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. From Here to Autonomy.
    Endsley MR
    Hum Factors; 2017 Feb; 59(1):5-27. PubMed ID: 28146676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust and the Compliance-Reliance Paradigm: The Effects of Risk, Error Bias, and Reliability on Trust and Dependence.
    Chancey ET; Bliss JP; Yamani Y; Handley HAH
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):333-345. PubMed ID: 28430544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benchmarking Aided Decision Making in a Signal Detection Task.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2017 Sep; 59(6):881-900. PubMed ID: 28796974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does automation trust evolve from a leap of faith? An analysis using a reprogrammed pasteurizer simulation task.
    Long SK; Lee J; Yamani Y; Unverricht J; Itoh M
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Apr; 100():103674. PubMed ID: 35026680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial validation of the trust of automated systems test (TOAST).
    Wojton HM; Porter D; T Lane S; Bieber C; Madhavan P
    J Soc Psychol; 2020 Nov; 160(6):735-750. PubMed ID: 32297844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can Robots Earn Our Trust the Same Way Humans Do? A Systematic Exploration of Competence, Warmth, and Anthropomorphism as Determinants of Trust Development in HRI.
    Christoforakos L; Gallucci A; Surmava-Große T; Ullrich D; Diefenbach S
    Front Robot AI; 2021; 8():640444. PubMed ID: 33898531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management.
    Mercado JE; Rupp MA; Chen JY; Barnes MJ; Barber D; Procci K
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 26867556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automation usage decisions: controlling intent and appraisal errors in a target detection task.
    Beck HR; Dzindolet MT; Pierce LG
    Hum Factors; 2007 Jun; 49(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 17552307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of automation transparency in the management of multiple unmanned vehicles.
    Bhaskara A; Duong L; Brooks J; Li R; McInerney R; Skinner M; Pongracic H; Loft S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103243. PubMed ID: 32919121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operator adaptation to changes in system reliability under adaptable automation.
    Chavaillaz A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2017 Sep; 60(9):1261-1272. PubMed ID: 27875937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of information source, pedigree, and reliability on operator interaction with decision support systems.
    Madhavan P; Wiegmann DA
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):773-85. PubMed ID: 17915596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ironic efficiency in automation-aided signal detection.
    Bartlett ML; McCarley JS
    Ergonomics; 2021 Jan; 64(1):103-112. PubMed ID: 32790530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhancing component-specific trust with consumer automated systems through humanness design.
    Lopez J; Watkins H; Pak R
    Ergonomics; 2023 Feb; 66(2):291-302. PubMed ID: 35583421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.