143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37101641)
1. Factors affecting cultural ecosystem services use in Vilnius (Lithuania): A participatory mapping survey approach.
Pinto LV; Inácio M; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Gomes E; Pereira P
Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e15384. PubMed ID: 37101641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental and socioeconomic factors influencing the use of urban green spaces in Coimbra (Portugal).
Pinto L; Ferreira CSS; Pereira P
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 792():148293. PubMed ID: 34147815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mapping and assessing coastal recreation cultural ecosystem services supply, flow, and demand in Lithuania.
Inácio M; Gomes E; Bogdzevič K; Kalinauskas M; Zhao W; Pereira P
J Environ Manage; 2022 Dec; 323():116175. PubMed ID: 36088764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping and assessment of recreational cultural ecosystem services supply and demand in Vilnius (Lithuania).
Kalinauskas M; Bogdzevič K; Gomes E; Inácio M; Barcelo D; Zhao W; Pereira P
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 855():158590. PubMed ID: 36165823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: a case from English Bazar Urban Agglomeration, Eastern India.
Das A; Das M; Saha S; Pereira P
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(24):65933-65946. PubMed ID: 37093391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Participatory mapping of cultural ecosystem services for landscape corridor planning: A case study of the Silk Roads corridor in Zhangye, China.
Xu H; Zhao G; Fagerholm N; Primdahl J; Plieninger T
J Environ Manage; 2020 Jun; 264():110458. PubMed ID: 32250892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai, China].
Peng WT; Liu WQ; Cai WB; Wang X; Huang Z; Wu CZ
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2019 Feb; 30(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 30915794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outdoor recreation and nature's contribution to well-being in a pandemic situation - Case Turku, Finland.
Fagerholm N; Eilola S; Arki V
Urban For Urban Green; 2021 Sep; 64():127257. PubMed ID: 34493936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mapping and assessment of landscape aesthetic quality in Lithuania.
Kalinauskas M; Mikša K; Inácio M; Gomes E; Pereira P
J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 286():112239. PubMed ID: 33662753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Residential Green Spaces From the Perspective of Residents' Satisfaction With Green Space.
Mao Q; Wang L; Guo Q; Li Y; Liu M; Xu G
Front Public Health; 2020; 8():226. PubMed ID: 32766190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptions of ecosystem services: Comparing socio-cultural and environmental influences.
Thiemann M; Riebl R; Haensel M; Schmitt TM; Steinbauer MJ; Landwehr T; Fricke U; Redlich S; Koellner T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0276432. PubMed ID: 36301819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. National assessment of cultural ecosystem services: Participatory mapping in Switzerland.
Jaligot R; Hasler S; Chenal J
Ambio; 2019 Oct; 48(10):1219-1233. PubMed ID: 30612314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cultural ecosystem services provided by the Baltic Sea marine environment.
Ahtiainen H; Liski E; Pouta E; Soini K; Bertram C; Rehdanz K; Pakalniete K; Meyerhof J
Ambio; 2019 Nov; 48(11):1350-1361. PubMed ID: 31473976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the role of spatial landscape literacy in public participation processes and opinions on environmental issues and ecosystem services.
Escobedo FJ; Bottin M; Clerici N; Camargo SG; Feged-Rivadeneira A
Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 69(2):244-257. PubMed ID: 35024896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.
Tian Y; Wu H; Zhang G; Wang L; Zheng D; Li S
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110140. PubMed ID: 32090834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How do landscape patterns in urban parks affect multiple cultural ecosystem services perceived by residents?
Bi X; Gan X; Jiang Z; Li Z; Li J
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Jun; 946():174255. PubMed ID: 38925389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effectively enhancing perceptions of cultural ecosystem services: A case study of a karst cultural ecosystem.
Nie X; Wang Q; Wu J; Wang H; Chen Z; He J
J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115189. PubMed ID: 35523071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Explaining demographic-destination preferences for cultural ecosystem services: A set-theoretic configurational analysis.
Wang Y; Hayashi K
Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(3):e25054. PubMed ID: 38327477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis.
Hunter RF; Cleland C; Cleary A; Droomers M; Wheeler BW; Sinnett D; Nieuwenhuijsen MJ; Braubach M
Environ Int; 2019 Sep; 130():104923. PubMed ID: 31228780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the Impact of Marine Tourism and Protection on Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Integrated Approach: A Case Study of Gili Matra Islands.
Banarsyadhimi URAMF; Dargusch P; Kurniawan F
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Sep; 19(19):. PubMed ID: 36231380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
