173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37101692)
1. HDFCN: A Robust Hybrid Deep Network Based on Feature Concatenation for Cervical Cancer Diagnosis on WSI Pap Smear Slides.
Chauhan NK; Singh K; Kumar A; Kolambakar SB
Biomed Res Int; 2023; 2023():4214817. PubMed ID: 37101692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep Convolution Neural Network for Malignancy Detection and Classification in Microscopic Uterine Cervix Cell Images.
P B S; Faruqi F; K S H; Kudva R
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Nov; 20(11):3447-3456. PubMed ID: 31759371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DeepCyto: a hybrid framework for cervical cancer classification by using deep feature fusion of cytology images.
Shinde S; Kalbhor M; Wajire P
Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Apr; 19(7):6415-6434. PubMed ID: 35730264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nucleus segmentation and classification using residual SE-UNet and feature concatenation approach incervical cytopathology cell images.
Chowdary GJ; G S; M P; Yogarajah P
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2023; 22():15330338221134833. PubMed ID: 36744768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Deep Learning Models for Multi-cell Classification in Liquid- based Cervical Cytology Image.
Sornapudi S; Brown GT; Xue Z; Long R; Allen L; Antani S
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():820-827. PubMed ID: 32308878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CervixFormer: A Multi-scale swin transformer-Based cervical pap-Smear WSI classification framework.
Khan A; Han S; Ilyas N; Lee YM; Lee B
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Oct; 240():107718. PubMed ID: 37451230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical cancer detection in pap smear whole slide images using convNet with transfer learning and progressive resizing.
Bhatt AR; Ganatra A; Kotecha K
PeerJ Comput Sci; 2021; 7():e348. PubMed ID: 33816998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. DeepPap: Deep Convolutional Networks for Cervical Cell Classification.
Zhang L; Le Lu ; Nogues I; Summers RM; Liu S; Yao J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2017 Nov; 21(6):1633-1643. PubMed ID: 28541229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A fuzzy rank-based ensemble of CNN models for classification of cervical cytology.
Manna A; Kundu R; Kaplun D; Sinitca A; Sarkar R
Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14538. PubMed ID: 34267261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enhancing cervical cancer detection and robust classification through a fusion of deep learning models.
Mathivanan SK; Francis D; Srinivasan S; Khatavkar V; P K; Shah MA
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10812. PubMed ID: 38734714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Feb; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 30755214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer diagnosis based on modified uniform local ternary patterns and feed forward multilayer network optimized by genetic algorithm.
Fekri-Ershad S; Ramakrishnan S
Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105392. PubMed ID: 35299043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Liqui-Prep® versus conventional Papanicolaou smear to detect cervical cells abnormality by split-sample technique: a randomized double-blind controlled trial.
Jesdapatarakul S; Tangjitgamol S; Nguansangiam S; Manusirivithaya S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Jan; 39(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20063407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving cervical cancer classification in PAP smear images with enhanced segmentation and deep progressive learning-based techniques.
Mahajan P; Kaur P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2024 Jun; 52(6):313-324. PubMed ID: 38516853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical Cancer Detection between Conventional and Liquid Based Cervical Cytology: a 6-Year Experience in Northern Bangkok Thailand.
Phaliwong P; Pariyawateekul P; Khuakoonratt N; Sirichai W; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 May; 19(5):1331-1336. PubMed ID: 29802695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk factors of cervical cancer after a negative cytological diagnosis in Polish cervical cancer screening programme.
Macios A; Didkowska J; Wojciechowska U; Komerska K; Glińska P; Kamiński MF; Nowakowski A
Cancer Med; 2021 May; 10(10):3449-3460. PubMed ID: 33934537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
