145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37102364)
21. Effect of shear stress and growth conditions on detachment and physical properties of biofilms.
Paul E; Ochoa JC; Pechaud Y; Liu Y; Liné A
Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(17):5499-5508. PubMed ID: 22898671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Hydrodynamic effects on bacterial biofilm development in a microfluidic environment.
Kim J; Kim HS; Han S; Lee JY; Oh JE; Chung S; Park HD
Lab Chip; 2013 May; 13(10):1846-9. PubMed ID: 23576069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can the carbon metabolic activity of biofilm be regulated by the hydrodynamic conditions in urban rivers?
Hou J; Shao G; Adyel TM; Li C; Liu Z; Liu S; Miao L
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Aug; 832():155082. PubMed ID: 35398435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Flow cell hydrodynamics and their effects on E. coli biofilm formation under different nutrient conditions and turbulent flow.
Teodósio JS; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
Biofouling; 2011 Jan; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 21082456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Early biofilm and streamer formation is mediated by wall shear stress and surface wettability: A multifactorial microfluidic study.
Chun ALM; Mosayyebi A; Butt A; Carugo D; Salta M
Microbiologyopen; 2022 Aug; 11(4):e1310. PubMed ID: 36031954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Selection of Platforms to Evaluate Surface Adhesion and Biofilm Formation in Controlled Hydrodynamic Conditions.
Gomes LC; Mergulhão FJM
Microorganisms; 2021 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 34576888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. In situ non-destructive measurement of biofilm thickness and topology in an interferometric optical microscope.
Larimer C; Suter JD; Bonheyo G; Addleman RS
J Biophotonics; 2016 Jun; 9(6):656-66. PubMed ID: 26992071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Computational and Experimental Investigation of Biofilm Disruption Dynamics Induced by High-Velocity Gas Jet Impingement.
Prades L; Fabbri S; Dorado AD; Gamisans X; Stoodley P; Picioreanu C
mBio; 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31911489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Critical hydrodynamic force levels for efficient removal of oral biofilms in simulated interdental spaces.
Hotic M; Ackermann M; Bopp J; Hofmann N; Karygianni L; Paqué PN
Clin Oral Investig; 2024 May; 28(6):346. PubMed ID: 38819592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Understanding the flow behavior around marine biofilms.
Romeu MJ; Miranda JM; de Jong ED; Morais J; Vasconcelos V; Sjollema J; Mergulhão FJ
Biofilm; 2024 Jun; 7():100204. PubMed ID: 38948680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Segmented flow is controlling growth of catalytic biofilms in continuous multiphase microreactors.
Karande R; Halan B; Schmid A; Buehler K
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2014 Sep; 111(9):1831-40. PubMed ID: 24729096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of biomass detachment from biofilms of two different Pseudomonas spp. under constant shear conditions.
Gazzola G; Habimana O; Murphy CD; Casey E
Biofouling; 2015; 31(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25563340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Coupled CFD-DEM modeling to predict how EPS affects bacterial biofilm deformation, recovery and detachment under flow conditions.
Xia Y; Jayathilake PG; Li B; Zuliani P; Deehan D; Longyear J; Stoodley P; Chen J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2022 Sep; 119(9):2551-2563. PubMed ID: 35610631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bacterial biofilm under flow: First a physical struggle to stay, then a matter of breathing.
Thomen P; Robert J; Monmeyran A; Bitbol AF; Douarche C; Henry N
PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175197. PubMed ID: 28403171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Turbulence accelerates the growth of drinking water biofilms.
Tsagkari E; Sloan WT
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2018 Jun; 41(6):757-770. PubMed ID: 29428998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The control of biofilm formation by hydrodynamics of purified water in industrial distribution system.
Florjanič M; Kristl J
Int J Pharm; 2011 Feb; 405(1-2):16-22. PubMed ID: 21129467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of biomimetic surfaces to reduce single- and dual-species biofilms of
Teixeira-Santos R; Azevedo A; Romeu MJ; Amador CI; Gomes LC; Whitehead KA; Sjollema J; Burmølle M; Mergulhão FJ
Biofilm; 2024 Jun; 7():100185. PubMed ID: 38444517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Boundary layer hydrodynamics of patchy biofilms.
Murphy EAK; Barros JM; Schultz MP; Flack KA; Steppe CN; Reidenbach MA
Biofouling; 2022 Aug; 38(7):696-714. PubMed ID: 36062568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Behavior of Listeria monocytogenes in a Pseudomonas putida biofilm on a condensate-forming surface.
Hassan AN; Birt DM; Frank JF
J Food Prot; 2004 Feb; 67(2):322-7. PubMed ID: 14968965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Macroscale versus microscale methods for physiological analysis of biofilms formed in 96-well microtiter plates.
Gomes LC; Moreira JM; Miranda JM; Simões M; Melo LF; Mergulhão FJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Dec; 95(3):342-9. PubMed ID: 24140575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
