These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37102534)

  • 1. Accuracy of single-unit ceramic crown fabrication after digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Manisha J; Srivastava G; Das SS; Tabarak N; Choudhury GK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37102534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions.
    Zarauz C; Valverde A; Martinez-Rus F; Hassan B; Pradies G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 May; 20(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 26362778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.
    Ahrberg D; Lauer HC; Ahrberg M; Weigl P
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 26070435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of conventional and digital intraoral impressions on the fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated all-ceramic crowns.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Dec; 20(9):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 26800669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of 3-unit ceramic fixed dental prostheses made with either a conventional or digital impression.
    Su TS; Sun J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):362-7. PubMed ID: 27061628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical evaluation comparing the fit of all-ceramic crowns obtained from silicone and digital intraoral impressions based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Pradíes G; Zarauz C; Valverde A; Ferreiroa A; Martínez-Rus F
    J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):201-8. PubMed ID: 25527248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the marginal fit of single-unit, complete-coverage ceramic restorations fabricated after digital and conventional impressions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsirogiannis P; Reissmann DR; Heydecke G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):328-335.e2. PubMed ID: 27061627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Accuracy of Fit of Metal, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Crowns Made from Different Manufacturing Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Quran FA; AlJalam SA; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 30719780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit.
    Zeltner M; Sailer I; Mühlemann S; Özcan M; Hämmerle CH; Benic GI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):354-362. PubMed ID: 27677220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated with CAD/CAM technology by using conventional impressions and two intraoral digital scanners.
    Abdel-Azim T; Rogers K; Elathamna E; Zandinejad A; Metz M; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Oct; 114(4):554-9. PubMed ID: 26100929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hasanzade M; Aminikhah M; Afrashtehfar KI; Alikhasi M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 32928518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study of all-ceramic crowns obtained from conventional and digital impressions: clinical findings.
    Berrendero S; Salido MP; Ferreiroa A; Valverde A; Pradíes G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1745-1751. PubMed ID: 30167795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and Efficiency of Digitally Fabricated All-Ceramic Crowns from Conventional Impressions and Intraoral Scans: A Single-Blind Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Liu X; Feng K; Dong L; Liu L; Ni L; Zheng D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 37(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36484666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full-Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Tabesh M; Nejatidanesh F; Savabi G; Davoudi A; Savabi O
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 31(9):744-753. PubMed ID: 35344238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of pressed ceramic crowns made from conventional and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing wax patterns: An in vitro comparison.
    Shamseddine L; Mortada R; Rifai K; Chidiac JJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Aug; 116(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 26948080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.