These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37103019)

  • 1. IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: "In Silico" Study.
    De Lazzari B; Capoccia M; Badagliacca R; Bozkurt S; De Lazzari C
    J Cardiovasc Dev Dis; 2023 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 37103019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling and Simulation of the Combined Use of IABP and Impella as a Rescue Procedure in Cardiogenic Shock: An Alternative for Non-Transplant Centres?
    De Lazzari B; Capoccia M; Badagliacca R; De Lazzari C
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 38136025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trends in Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Life Support With and Without an Impella or Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Hendrickson MJ; Jain V; Bhatia K; Chew C; Arora S; Rossi JS; Villablanca P; Kapur NK; Joshi AA; Fox A; Mahmood K; Birati EY; Ricciardi MJ; Qamar A
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(23):e025216. PubMed ID: 36420809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Percutaneous left ventricular assistance in post cardiac arrest shock: comparison of intra aortic blood pump and IMPELLA Recover LP2.5.
    Manzo-Silberman S; Fichet J; Mathonnet A; Varenne O; Ricome S; Chaib A; Zuber B; Spaulding C; Cariou A
    Resuscitation; 2013 May; 84(5):609-15. PubMed ID: 23069592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.
    Schäfer A; Werner N; Burkhoff D; Sieweke JT; Zietzer A; Masyuk M; Junker Udesen NL; Westenfeld R; Møller JE
    Front Cardiovasc Med; 2020; 7():74. PubMed ID: 32478095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro comparison of support capabilities of intra-aortic balloon pump and Impella 2.5 left percutaneous.
    Schampaert S; van't Veer M; van de Vosse FN; Pijls NH; de Mol BA; Rutten MC
    Artif Organs; 2011 Sep; 35(9):893-901. PubMed ID: 21819436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percutaneous left ventricular assist support is associated with less pulmonary congestion and lower rate of pneumonia in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Haberkorn S; Uwarow A; Haurand J; Jung C; Kelm M; Westenfeld R; Horn P
    Open Heart; 2020 Nov; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 33132209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with concomitant Impella versus concomitant intra-aortic-balloon-pump for cardiogenic shock.
    Au SY; Fong KM; Tsang CS; Chan KA; Wong CY; Ng WG; Lee KYM
    Perfusion; 2023 Jan; 38(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 34318736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impella versus IABP in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    Alushi B; Douedari A; Froehlig G; Knie W; Wurster TH; Leistner DM; Stahli BE; Mochmann HC; Pieske B; Landmesser U; Krackhardt F; Skurk C
    Open Heart; 2019; 6(1):e000987. PubMed ID: 31218000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical ventilation and thoracic artificial lung assistance during mechanical circulatory support with PUCA pump: in silico study.
    De Lazzari C; Genuini I; Quatember B; Fedele F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Feb; 113(2):642-54. PubMed ID: 24332823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.
    Seyfarth M; Sibbing D; Bauer I; Fröhlich G; Bott-Flügel L; Byrne R; Dirschinger J; Kastrati A; Schömig A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Nov; 52(19):1584-8. PubMed ID: 19007597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and haemodynamic support with intra-aortic balloon versus Impella pump: Real-life single-centre preliminary results.
    Januszek R; Pawlik A; Rzeszutko Ł; Bartuś K; Bartuś S
    Kardiol Pol; 2022; 80(12):1224-1231. PubMed ID: 36047958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Use With Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Mock Circulation Loop Study.
    Farag J; Stephens AF; Juene Chong W; Gregory SD; Marasco SF
    ASAIO J; 2022 May; 68(5):669-675. PubMed ID: 34352814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation timing: A new numerical model for programming and training in the clinical environment.
    De Lazzari C; De Lazzari B; Iacovoni A; Marconi S; Papa S; Capoccia M; Badagliacca R; Vizza CD
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 194():105537. PubMed ID: 32425283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-aortic balloon pump is associated with the lowest whereas Impella with the highest inpatient mortality and complications regardless of severity or hospital types.
    Movahed MR; Talle A; Hashemzadeh M
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2024 Jul; 39(3):252-261. PubMed ID: 38555535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of the axillary Impella 5.0 device on patients with acute cardiogenic shock.
    Tarabichi S; Ikegami H; Russo MJ; Lee LY; Lemaire A
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(1):218. PubMed ID: 32795321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.