These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37104764)

  • 1. Pooling methods for likelihood ratio tests in multiply imputed data sets.
    Grund S; Lüdtke O; Robitzsch A
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Oct; 28(5):1207-1221. PubMed ID: 37104764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multiple imputation score test for model modification in structural equation models.
    Mansolf M; Jorgensen TD; Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Aug; 25(4):393-411. PubMed ID: 31621350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pooling test statistics across multiply imputed datasets for nonnormal items.
    Jia F
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1229-1243. PubMed ID: 36973636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to apply variable selection machine learning algorithms with multiply imputed data: A missing discussion.
    Gunn HJ; Hayati Rezvan P; Fernández MI; Comulada WS
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Apr; 28(2):452-471. PubMed ID: 35113633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data.
    Enders CK; Mansolf M
    Psychol Methods; 2018 Mar; 23(1):76-93. PubMed ID: 27893216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Model selection of generalized estimating equations with multiply imputed longitudinal data.
    Shen CW; Chen YH
    Biom J; 2013 Nov; 55(6):899-911. PubMed ID: 23970494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A true score imputation method to account for psychometric measurement error.
    Mansolf M
    Psychol Methods; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37227895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Significance Tests and Estimates for
    van Ginkel JR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(4):514-529. PubMed ID: 30822143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package.
    Zhang Z
    Ann Transl Med; 2016 Jan; 4(2):30. PubMed ID: 26889483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of Variance of Multiply Imputed Data.
    van Ginkel JR; Kroonenberg PM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2014 Jan; 49(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 24860197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A practical guide to multiple imputation of missing data in nephrology.
    Blazek K; van Zwieten A; Saglimbene V; Teixeira-Pinto A
    Kidney Int; 2021 Jan; 99(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 32822702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combination rules for homoscedastic and heteroscedastic MANOVA models from multiply imputed datasets.
    Vallejo G; Fernández MP; Rosário P
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):669-685. PubMed ID: 32804343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference following multiple imputation for generalized additive models: an investigation of the median p-value rule with applications to the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry and Colorado COVID-19 hospitalization data.
    Bolt MA; MaWhinney S; Pattee JW; Erlandson KM; Badesch DB; Peterson RA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 May; 22(1):148. PubMed ID: 35597908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple pooling method for variable selection in multiply imputed datasets outperformed complex methods.
    Panken AM; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):214. PubMed ID: 35927610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Missing Data in Clinical Research: A Tutorial on Multiple Imputation.
    Austin PC; White IR; Lee DS; van Buuren S
    Can J Cardiol; 2021 Sep; 37(9):1322-1331. PubMed ID: 33276049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for significance testing of categorical covariates in logistic regression models after multiple imputation: power and applicability analysis.
    Eekhout I; van de Wiel MA; Heymans MW
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Aug; 17(1):129. PubMed ID: 28830466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of full information maximum likelihood and multiple imputation in structural equation modeling with missing data.
    Lee T; Shi D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):466-485. PubMed ID: 33507765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bias-corrected estimator in multiple imputation for missing data.
    Tomita H; Fujisawa H; Henmi M
    Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(23):3373-3386. PubMed ID: 29845646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardized Regression Coefficients and Newly Proposed Estimators for [Formula: see text] in Multiply Imputed Data.
    van Ginkel JR
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):185-205. PubMed ID: 32162232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. dynr.mi: An R Program for Multiple Imputation in Dynamic Modeling.
    Li Y; Ji L; Oravecz Z; Brick TR; Hunter MD; Chow SM
    World Acad Sci Eng Technol; 2019; 13(5):302-311. PubMed ID: 31431819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.