BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37105052)

  • 1. Possibility of additive effects by the presentation of visual information related to distractor sounds on the contra-sound effects of the N100m responses.
    Takai S; Kanno A; Kawase T; Shirakura M; Suzuki J; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 434():108778. PubMed ID: 37105052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different contra-sound effects between noise and music stimuli seen in N1m and psychophysical responses.
    Shirakura M; Kawase T; Kanno A; Ohta J; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261637. PubMed ID: 34928999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. N100m latency shortening caused by selective attention.
    Nomura Y; Kawase T; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 1751():147177. PubMed ID: 33121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [N100m findings of auditory-evoked fields in patients with psychogenic hearing impairment].
    Sakamoto M; Itasaka Y; Ishikawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2007 Oct; 110(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 18018595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Human cortical responses evoked by dichotically presented tones of different frequencies.
    Yvert B; Bertrand O; Pernier J; Ilmoniemi RJ
    Neuroreport; 1998 Apr; 9(6):1115-9. PubMed ID: 9601678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
    Kawase T; Maki A; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Sato M; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory cortex activation associated with octave illusion.
    Lamminmäki S; Hari R
    Neuroreport; 2000 May; 11(7):1469-72. PubMed ID: 10841359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of auditory cortical responses to ipsilateral stimuli during dichotic listening: evidence from magnetoencephalography.
    Brancucci A; Babiloni C; Babiloni F; Galderisi S; Mucci A; Tecchio F; Zappasodi F; Pizzella V; Romani GL; Rossini PM
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 19(8):2329-36. PubMed ID: 15090059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
    Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortical differentiation of speech and nonspeech sounds at 100 ms: implications for dyslexia.
    Parviainen T; Helenius P; Salmelin R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jul; 15(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 15563727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound-Making Actions Lead to Immediate Plastic Changes of Neuromagnetic Evoked Responses and Induced β-Band Oscillations during Perception.
    Ross B; Barat M; Fujioka T
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(24):5948-5959. PubMed ID: 28539421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neuromagnetic auditory steady-state responses to amplitude modulated sounds following dichotic or monaural presentation.
    Lazzouni L; Ross B; Voss P; Lepore F
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Feb; 121(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 20005163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
    Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
    Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency characteristics of contralateral sound suppression of 40-Hz auditory steady-state response.
    Kiyokawa H; Kawase T; Oshima H; Maki A; Kobayashi T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Mar; 269(3):791-7. PubMed ID: 21826563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex.
    Martikainen MH; Kaneko K; Hari R
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Mar; 15(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 15238430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.