140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37105062)
21. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival associated with extent of radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: a subanalysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study.
Bizzarri N; Querleu D; Dostálek L; van Lonkhuijzen LRCW; Giannarelli D; Lopez A; Salehi S; Ayhan A; Kim SH; Ortiz DI; Klat J; Landoni F; Pareja R; Manchanda R; Kosťun J; Ramirez PT; Meydanli MM; Odetto D; Laky R; Zapardiel I; Weinberger V; Dos Reis R; Pedone Anchora L; Amaro K; Akilli H; Abu-Rustum NR; Salcedo-Hernández RA; Javůrková V; Mom CH; Scambia G; Falconer H; Cibula D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):428.e1-428.e12. PubMed ID: 37336255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.
Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.
Aubrey C; Pond GR; Helpman L; Vicus D; Elit L; Plante M; Lau S; Kwon JS; Altman AD; Willows K; Feigenberg T; Sabourin J; Samouelian V; Bernard L; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Piedimonte S; Teo-Fortin LA; Kim SR; Sadeq N; Jang JH; Shamiya S; Nelson G
Curr Oncol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):1977-1985. PubMed ID: 36826114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Lymph Node Ratio Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Yonsei Med J; 2021 Mar; 62(3):231-239. PubMed ID: 33635013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer.
Bai H; Cao D; Yuan F; Wang H; Xiao M; Chen J; Cui Q; Shen K; Zhang Z
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25992. PubMed ID: 27181832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer.
Bogani G; Ditto A; Chiappa V; Pinelli C; Sonetto C; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2020 Oct; 151(1):43-48. PubMed ID: 32511745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparotomic radical hysterectomy versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using vaginal colpotomy for the management of stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Yang EJ; Kim NR; Lee AJ; Shim SH; Lee SJ
Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Feb; 101(8):e28911. PubMed ID: 35212297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The efficacy of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Ma B; Li W; Li P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):106995. PubMed ID: 37527959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: Can conization specimens help identify patients at low risk for parametrial involvement?
Smith B; McCann GA; Phillips G; Backes FJ; O'Malley DM; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Salani R
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Feb; 144(2):290-293. PubMed ID: 27884514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancer.
Coronado PJ; Gracia M
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 92():102434. PubMed ID: 38134716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Carcinomatosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Treated with Robotic Radical Hysterectomy: Recurrence Patterns, Risk Factors, and Survival.
Fitzsimmons CK; Stephens AJ; Kennard JA; Manyam M; Pepe JW; Ahmad S; McKenzie ND; Kendrick JE; Holloway RW
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Mar; 29(3):2006-2013. PubMed ID: 34757549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The MEMORY Study: MulticentEr study of Minimally invasive surgery versus Open Radical hYsterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Leitao MM; Zhou QC; Brandt B; Iasonos A; Sioulas V; Lavigne Mager K; Shahin M; Bruce S; Black DR; Kay CG; Gandhi M; Qayyum M; Scalici J; Jones NL; Paladugu R; Brown J; Naumann RW; Levine MD; Mendivil A; Lim PC; Kang E; Cantrell LA; Sullivan MW; Martino MA; Kratz MK; Kolev V; Tomita S; Leath CA; Boitano TKL; Doo DW; Feltmate C; Sugrue R; Olawaiye AB; Goldfeld E; Ferguson SE; Suhner J; Abu-Rustum NR
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Sep; 166(3):417-424. PubMed ID: 35879128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of preoperative cervical conization before hysterectomy on survival and recurrence of patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han L; Chen Y; Zheng A; Chen H
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():167-174. PubMed ID: 37207501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.
Liu P; Lin L; Kong Y; Huo Z; Zhu L; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):189. PubMed ID: 32138718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is conization once following by simple hysterectomy sufficient for all clinical stage IA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma?
Chen JR; Chiu ML; Wang TY; Chen TC; Wang KG; Su TH; Chang CL; Yang YC; Wang KL
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Sep; 52(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 24075378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
