These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37105267)

  • 1. Women with substance use disorders are highly impacted by the overturning of Roe v. Wade: Advocacy steps are urgently needed.
    Slavin MN; West BS; Levin FR; El-Bassel N
    J Subst Use Addict Treat; 2023 Jul; 150():209052. PubMed ID: 37105267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.
    Benshoof J
    Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.
    Martin PA
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(3):309-19. PubMed ID: 8293219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Shouldn't Nobody Make a Woman do What they Don't Want to do with their Body": Black Women's Reactions to the Supreme Court's Overturn of Roe v. Wade.
    Coates EE; de Heer R; McLeod A; Porter SC; Hoffman SB
    J Racial Ethn Health Disparities; 2024 Apr; 11(2):968-979. PubMed ID: 36976512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.
    Berg JA; Woods NF
    Womens Midlife Health; 2023 Jan; 9(1):2. PubMed ID: 36609311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Challenging the US Supreme Court's Majority Ruling on
    Berer M
    Health Hum Rights; 2023 Jun; 25(1):195-206. PubMed ID: 37397425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Roe v. Wade and "partial birth abortion" bans.
    Reprod Freedom News; 1998 Jan; 7(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 12293726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortion in America: 12 years after Roe v. Wade.
    Popul Today; 1985 Nov; 13(11):2, 8-9. PubMed ID: 12267463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of Recent Abortion Legislation on Twitter User Engagement, Sentiment, and Expressions of Trust in Clinicians and Privacy of Health Information: Content Analysis.
    Swanson K; Ravi A; Saleh S; Weia B; Pleasants E; Arvisais-Anhalt S
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 May; 25():e46655. PubMed ID: 37171873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
    Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The abortion struggle in America.
    Warren MA
    Bioethics; 1989 Oct; 3(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 11651956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
    Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.
    Byron JJ; Avalos M; Xiao KA; Klein AA; Leheste JR
    Cureus; 2022 Dec; 14(12):e32100. PubMed ID: 36601141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.
    Cook RJ
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):384-94. PubMed ID: 2628654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.
    Baron CH
    Law Med Health Care; 1989; 17(4):368-75. PubMed ID: 2628652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(4):174-7, 185. PubMed ID: 1526274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Roe v. Wade. Revisiting the fundamentals.
    Benshoof J
    Conscience; 1998; 18(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 12178876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.