These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37105431)
1. Effect of the number and distribution of fiducial markers on the accuracy of robot-guided implant surgery in edentulous mandibular arches: An in vitro study. Zhao Y; Liao Y; Wu X; Zhang Y; Shi B; Yan Q J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104529. PubMed ID: 37105431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and safety of a haptic operated and machine vision controlled collaborative robot for dental implant placement: A translational study. Qiao SC; Wu XY; Shi JY; Tonetti MS; Lai HC Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Aug; 34(8):839-849. PubMed ID: 37309242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of haptic robotic guidance of dental implant surgery for completely edentulous arches. Bolding SL; Reebye UN J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):639-647. PubMed ID: 33678441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study. Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series. Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of the configurations of fiducial markers on accuracy of surgical navigation in zygomatic implant placement: An in vitro study. Fan S; Hung K; Bornstein MM; Huang W; Wang F; Wu Y Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):85–90. PubMed ID: 30521651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study. Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of dental implant placement with a robotic system in partially edentulous patients: A prospective, single-arm clinical trial. Chen W; Al-Taezi KA; Chu CH; Shen Y; Wu J; Cai K; Chen P; Tang C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Jul; 34(7):707-718. PubMed ID: 37167364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical accuracy of flapless computer-guided surgery for implant placement in edentulous arches. Vieira DM; Sotto-Maior BS; Barros CA; Reis ES; Francischone CE Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):1347-51. PubMed ID: 24066327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: An in vitro study. Ruiz-Romero V; Jorba-Garcia A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105290. PubMed ID: 39106900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of a dynamic navigation device on the accuracy of implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible: An in vitro study. Feng Y; Yao Y; Yang X J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Nov; 130(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 35000696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. Stefanelli LV; DeGroot BS; Lipton DI; Mandelaris GA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(1):205–213. PubMed ID: 30521660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of implant shape and length on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant surgery: An in vitro study. Wang Y; Yu S; Wang Y; Feng Y; Yan Q; Zhang Y Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Mar; 35(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38174662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An in-vitro study. Cheng KJ; Kan TS; Liu YF; Zhu WD; Zhu FD; Wang WB; Jiang XF; Dong XT Comput Biol Med; 2021 Feb; 129():104153. PubMed ID: 33260102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study. Jaemsuwan S; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy and Precision of Haptic Robotic-Guided Implant Surgery in a Large Consecutive Series. Neugarten JM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 39(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 37939239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study. Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Zhuang M; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104170. PubMed ID: 35679989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of flapless surgery using an autonomous robotic system in full-arch immediate implant restoration: A case series. Shu Q; Chen D; Wang X; Liu Q; Ge Y; Su Y J Dent; 2024 Jun; 145():105017. PubMed ID: 38657725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dynamic and static computer-assisted implant surgery for completely edentulous patients. A proof of a concept. Pomares-Puig C; Sánchez-Garcés MA; Jorba-García A J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104443. PubMed ID: 36720424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]