These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37105433)

  • 1. Effects of remeshing algorithms on trueness of fit when used to compress .stl files for dental models: A narrative review.
    Michaud PL; Talmazov G
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104531. PubMed ID: 37105433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Triangular mesh reduction of digitized maxillectomy defects for prosthetic rehabilitation: A 3D deviation study.
    Elbashti ME; Aswehlee A; Rahman MA; Sumita YI; Bornstein MM; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Molinero-Mourelle P
    J Dent; 2022 Jul; 122():104090. PubMed ID: 35276319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
    Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness and fit of additively manufactured removable dies.
    Yilmaz B; Donmez MB; Kahveci Ç; Cuellar AR; de Paula MS; Schimmel M; Abou-Ayash S; Çakmak G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1318.e1-1318.e9. PubMed ID: 36435670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards.
    Jeon JH; Hwang SS; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2018 Oct; 10(5):335-339. PubMed ID: 30370023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible.
    Hayama H; Fueki K; Wadachi J; Wakabayashi N
    J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jul; 62(3):347-352. PubMed ID: 29502933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of impressions for multiple implants: A comparative study of digital and conventional techniques.
    Lyu M; Di P; Lin Y; Jiang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1017-1023. PubMed ID: 33640093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Congruence between the meshes of a combined healing abutment-scan body system acquired with four different intraoral scanners and the corresponding library file: An in vitro analysis.
    Donmez MB; Marques VR; Çakmak G; Yilmaz H; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2022 Mar; 118():103938. PubMed ID: 34942277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of decompression and online transmission on the dimensional changes of .stl files generated by intra-oral scanning.
    Bueno JM; Gouveia CG; Mundim MBV; Franco A; Junqueira JLC; Nascimento MDCC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0272989. PubMed ID: 36108093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The trueness of an intraoral scanner in scanning different post space depths.
    Elter B; Diker B; Tak Ö
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104352. PubMed ID: 36334784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy assessment (trueness and precision) of a confocal based intraoral scanner under twelve different ambient lighting conditions.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Adhikari RR; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR; Revilla-León M; Gallas-Torreira M
    J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104530. PubMed ID: 37116740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of digital implant analog design on the positional trueness of an analog in additively manufactured models: An in-vitro study.
    Mata-Mata SJ; Donmez MB; Meirelles L; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Dec; 24(6):821-830. PubMed ID: 36196856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization.
    Güth JF; Runkel C; Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Edelhoff D; Keul C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jun; 21(5):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 27406138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trueness of crowns fabricated by using additively and subtractively manufactured resin-based CAD-CAM materials.
    Çakmak G; Rusa AM; Donmez MB; Akay C; Kahveci Ç; Schimmel M; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):951-958. PubMed ID: 36470758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems - An in vitro study.
    Vecsei B; Joós-Kovács G; Borbély J; Hermann P
    J Prosthodont Res; 2017 Apr; 61(2):177-184. PubMed ID: 27461088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different tooth preparation finishing procedures and immediate dentin sealing on the scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners.
    Revilla-León M; Cascos-Sánchez R; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Gómez-Polo M
    J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104431. PubMed ID: 36682722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.