These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3710618)

  • 1. A radiobiological comparison of human tumor soft-agar clonogenic assays.
    West CM; Sutherland RM
    Int J Cancer; 1986 Jun; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 3710618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A serum-free medium for the Courtenay-Mills soft agar assay.
    Wilks DP; West CM
    Int J Cell Cloning; 1991 Nov; 9(6):559-69. PubMed ID: 1770230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lack of a relationship between colony-forming efficiency and surviving fraction at 2 Gy.
    West CM; Davidson SE; Pool C; James RD; Schofield PF
    Radiat Res; 1991 May; 126(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 2023996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clonogenic cell assay for anchorage-dependent squamous carcinoma cell lines using limiting dilution.
    Grenman R; Burk D; Virolainen E; Buick RN; Church J; Schwartz DR; Carey TE
    Int J Cancer; 1989 Jul; 44(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 2744882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selective assessment of in vitro radiosensitivity of tumour cells and fibroblasts from single tumour biopsies using immunocytochemical identification of colonies in the soft agar clonogenic assay.
    Stausbøl-Grøn B; Nielsen OS; Møller Bentzen S; Overgaard J
    Radiother Oncol; 1995 Nov; 37(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 8747932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Colony-forming ability of human ovarian carcinomas in the Courtenay soft agar assay.
    Tveit KM; Kaern J; Hoifodt HK; Pettersen EO; Abeler V; Davy M; Hannisdal E; Trope C
    Anticancer Res; 1989; 9(6):1577-82. PubMed ID: 2483300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Growth of fibroblasts as a potential confounding factor in soft agar clonogenic assays for tumour cell radiosensitivity.
    Lawton PA; Hodgkiss RJ; Eyden BP; Joiner MC
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Sep; 32(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 7529415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clonal growth of bladder cancer cells in a double layer soft agar assay: needles addition of multiple culture supplements.
    Lee K; Smith P; Weiss GH; Cockett AT
    Urol Res; 1990; 18(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 2396350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radiosensitivity, repair capacity, and stem cell fraction in human soft tissue tumors: an in vitro study using multicellular spheroids and the colony assay.
    Stuschke M; Budach V; Klaes W; Sack H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1992; 23(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 1572832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiosensitivity of new and established human melanoma cell lines: comparison of [3H]thymidine incorporation and soft agar clonogenic assays.
    Marshall ES; Matthews JH; Shaw JH; Nixon J; Tumewu P; Finlay GJ; Holdaway KM; Baguley BC
    Eur J Cancer; 1994; 30A(9):1370-6. PubMed ID: 7999427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two soft-agar methods for assaying chemosensitivity of human tumours in vitro: malignant melanomas.
    Tveit KM; Endresen L; Rugstad HE; Fodstad O; Pihl A
    Br J Cancer; 1981 Oct; 44(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 7295510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intrinsic radiosensitivity and sublethal damage repair capacity of five cervical carcinoma cell lines tested with the 96-well-plate assay.
    Rantanen V; Grénman S; Kulmala J; Grénman R
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1995; 121(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 7751322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chemosensitivity measurements of human tumour cells by soft agar assays are influenced by the culture conditions.
    Endresen L; Tveit KM; Rugstad HE; Pihl A
    Br J Cancer; 1985 Jun; 51(6):843-52. PubMed ID: 4005141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation survival of human mammary carcinoma cells: criteria for an agar-based clonogenic assay.
    Besch GJ; Tanner MA; Sattler CA; Wolberg WH; Howard SP; Gould MN
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1986 Jan; 12(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 3943995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A murine model to evaluate the ability of in vitro clonogenic assays to predict the response to tumors in vivo.
    Mirabelli CK; Sung CM; McCabe FL; Faucette LF; Crooke ST; Johnson RK
    Cancer Res; 1988 Oct; 48(19):5447-54. PubMed ID: 3046738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cultivation of human breast carcinoma in soft agar. Experience with 237 fresh tumour specimens.
    Ottestad L; Tveit KM; Høifødt HK; Nesland JM; Vaage S; Høie J; Lund E; Pihl A
    Br J Cancer; 1988 Jul; 58(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 3048354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of tumor cell viability and inoculum density on growth parameters in the human tumor, soft-agar clonogenic assay.
    Page RH; Tilchen EJ; Davis HL
    Cancer Res; 1988 Jul; 48(14):3944-8. PubMed ID: 3383190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of sulforhodamine B, tetrazolium and clonogenic assays for in vitro radiosensitivity testing in human ovarian cell lines.
    Griffon G; Merlin JL; Marchal C
    Anticancer Drugs; 1995 Feb; 6(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 7538827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differences in radiation response among human cervix carcinoma cell lines.
    Kelland LR; Steel GG
    Radiother Oncol; 1988 Nov; 13(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 3222467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of clonogenic cell fraction in primary cultures derived from human squamous cell carcinomas.
    Geara F; Girinski TA; Chavaudra N; Cosset JM; Dubray B; Brock WA; Malaise EP
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1991 Aug; 21(3):661-5. PubMed ID: 1869460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.