These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37106541)

  • 1. Comparison of Three Luting Cements for Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molar Teeth: a 36-month Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Srinivasan SR; Mathew MG; Jayaraman J
    Pediatr Dent; 2023 Mar; 45(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 37106541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of the fracture resistance of newly developed prefabricated fibreglass crowns and zirconium crowns.
    Çiftçi ZZ; Şahin İ; Karayılmaz H
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2022 Sep; 32(5):756-763. PubMed ID: 35102638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of Bond Strength of Different Luting Cements for Cementation of Stainless Steel Bands on Primary Molar Crowns (Stainless Steel and Zirconia Crowns): An
    Kalaskar R; Ijalkar R; Kalaskar A; Balasubramanian S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021; 14(6):762-767. PubMed ID: 35110868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of luting cement on the clinical outcomes of Zirconia pediatric crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized controlled trial.
    Azab MM; Moheb DM; El Shahawy OI; Rashed MA
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2020 May; 30(3):314-322. PubMed ID: 31845435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture Resistance of Prefabricated Primary Zirconium Crowns Cemented with Different Luting Cements.
    Sahin I; Karayilmaz H; Çiftçi ZZ; Kirzioglu Z
    Pediatr Dent; 2018 Nov; 40(7):443-448. PubMed ID: 31840645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term retention of zirconia crowns cemented with current automixed cements.
    Lepe X; Streiff KR; Johnson GH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):788-794. PubMed ID: 32669207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage around zirconia crown margins after ultrasonic scaling with self-adhesive resin or resin modified glass ionomer cement.
    Chang B; Goldstein R; Lin CP; Byreddy S; Lawson NC
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 29194924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Glass Ionomer Versus Self-adhesive Cement and the Clinical Performance of Zirconia Coping/Press-on Porcelain Crowns.
    Torres C; Ávila D; Gonçalves LL; Meirelles L; Mailart MC; Di Nicoló R; Borges AB
    Oper Dent; 2021 Jul; 46(4):362-373. PubMed ID: 34491349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.
    Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of recementation on crown retention.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Woelfel JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 9709609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.
    Memarpour M; Mesbahi M; Rezvani G; Rahimi M
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):501-4. PubMed ID: 22353410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements.
    Al-Haj Ali SN; Farah RI
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(6):387-392. PubMed ID: 30280311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of retentive groove, sandblasting and cement type on the retentive strength of stainless steel crowns in primary second molars--an in vitro comparative study.
    Veerabadhran MM; Reddy V; Nayak UA; Rao AP; Sundaram MA
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 22565513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M; Rosentritt M; Mangelkramer M; Handel G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of thermocycling with or without 1 year of water storage on retentive strengths of luting cements for zirconia crowns.
    Ehlers V; Kampf G; Stender E; Willershausen B; Ernst CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):609-15. PubMed ID: 25794911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal gap, cement thickness, and microleakage of 2 zirconia crown systems luted with glass ionomer and MDP-based cements.
    Sener I; Turker B; Valandro LF; Ozcan M
    Gen Dent; 2014; 62(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 24598500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention Force of Glass Ionomer Based Luting Cements with Posterior Primary Zirconium Crowns - A Comparative in Vitro Study.
    Walia T; Brigi C; Ziadkhani MM; Khayat AA; Tabibzadeh Z
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2021 Oct; 45(4):259-264. PubMed ID: 34534309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
    Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.