171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37112385)
21. A rehabilitation robot with force-position hybrid fuzzy controller: hybrid fuzzy control of rehabilitation robot.
Ju MS; Lin CC; Lin DH; Hwang IS; Chen SM
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):349-58. PubMed ID: 16200758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A proposal for patient-tailored supervision of movement performance during end-effector-based robot-assisted rehabilitation of the upper extremities.
Hennes M; Bollue K; Arenbeck H; Disselhorst-Klug C
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2015 Jun; 60(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 25460278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multi-mode adaptive control strategy for a lower limb rehabilitation robot.
Liang X; Yan Y; Dai S; Guo Z; Li Z; Liu S; Su T
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1392599. PubMed ID: 38817926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. RUPERT closed loop control design.
Balasubramanian S; Wei R; He J
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():3467-70. PubMed ID: 19163455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke.
Balasubramanian S; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Sanguineti V; Burdet E
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 91(11 Suppl 3):S255-69. PubMed ID: 23080041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements.
Vergaro E; Casadio M; Squeri V; Giannoni P; Morasso P; Sanguineti V
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2010 Mar; 7():13. PubMed ID: 20230610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the effects and usability of two exoskeletal robots with and without robotic actuation for upper extremity rehabilitation among patients with stroke: a single-blinded randomised controlled pilot study.
Park JH; Park G; Kim HY; Lee JY; Ham Y; Hwang D; Kwon S; Shin JH
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2020 Oct; 17(1):137. PubMed ID: 33076952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robustness and Tracking Performance Evaluation of PID Motion Control of 7 DoF Anthropomorphic Exoskeleton Robot Assisted Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Ahmed T; Islam MR; Brahmi B; Rahman MH
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Design and kinematical performance analysis of the 7-DOF upper-limb exoskeleton toward improving human-robot interface in active and passive movement training.
Meng Q; Fei C; Jiao Z; Xie Q; Dai Y; Fan Y; Shen Z; Yu H
Technol Health Care; 2022; 30(5):1167-1182. PubMed ID: 35342067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Self-powered robots to reduce motor slacking during upper-extremity rehabilitation: a proof of concept study.
Washabaugh EP; Treadway E; Gillespie RB; Remy CD; Krishnan C
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2018; 36(6):693-708. PubMed ID: 30400120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Using robot fully assisted functional movements in upper-limb rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: preliminary results.
Caimmi M; Chiavenna A; Scano A; Gasperini G; Giovanzana C; Molinari Tosatti L; Molteni F
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Jun; 53(3):390-399. PubMed ID: 27827517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Customized Trajectory Optimization and Compliant Tracking Control for Passive Upper Limb Rehabilitation.
Li L; Han J; Li X; Guo B; Wang X
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Aug; 23(15):. PubMed ID: 37571735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.
Daly JJ; Ruff RL
ScientificWorldJournal; 2007 Dec; 7():2031-45. PubMed ID: 18167618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Effects of two different robot-assisted arm training on upper limb motor function and kinematics in chronic stroke survivors: A randomized controlled trial.
Cho KH; Song WK
Top Stroke Rehabil; 2021 May; 28(4):241-250. PubMed ID: 32791945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Customizing Robot-Assisted Passive Neurorehabilitation Exercise Based on Teaching Training Mechanism.
Lin Y; Qu Q; Lin Y; He J; Zhang Q; Wang C; Jiang Z; Guo F; Jia J
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9972560. PubMed ID: 34195289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in subacute and chronic stroke patients using an innovative end-effector haptic device: A pilot study.
Mazzoleni S; Battini E; Crecchi R; Dario P; Posteraro F
NeuroRehabilitation; 2018; 42(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 29400670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke.
Stein J; Krebs HI; Frontera WR; Fasoli SE; Hughes R; Hogan N
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 83(9):720-8. PubMed ID: 15314537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A rehabilitation robot control framework with adaptation of training tasks and robotic assistance.
Xu J; Huang K; Zhang T; Cao K; Ji A; Xu L; Li Y
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2023; 11():1244550. PubMed ID: 37849981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
