158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3711304)
1. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody test to detect chlamydia in cervical and urethral specimens.
Forbes BA; Bartholoma N; McMillan J; Roefaro M; Weiner L; Welych L
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jun; 23(6):1136-7. PubMed ID: 3711304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Syva's enzyme immunoassay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens.
Moncada J; Schachter J; Bolan G; Nathan J; Shafer MA; Clark A; Schwebke J; Stamm W; Mroczkowski T; Seliborska Z
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1992; 15(8):663-8. PubMed ID: 1478048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital specimens by the Microtrak direct specimen test.
Coudron PE; Fedorko DP; Dawson MS; Kaplowitz LG; Brookman RR; Dalton HP; Davis BA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1986 Jan; 85(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 3510051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enzyme amplified immunoassay: a novel technique applied to direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.
Pugh SF; Slack RC; Caul EO; Paul ID; Appleton PN; Gatley S
J Clin Pathol; 1985 Oct; 38(10):1139-41. PubMed ID: 3902899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women.
Chernesky MA; Mahony JB; Castriciano S; Mores M; Stewart IO; Landis SJ; Seidelman W; Sargeant EJ; Leman C
J Infect Dis; 1986 Jul; 154(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3519787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay and Gen-Probe PACE 2 with cell culture for diagnosis of cervical Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a high-prevalence female population.
Clarke LM; Sierra MF; Daidone BJ; Lopez N; Covino JM; McCormack WM
J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Apr; 31(4):968-71. PubMed ID: 7681852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Cellmatics and direct monoclonal fluorescence antibody staining for detection of genital chlamydial infections.
Peterson EM; Alexander R; Aarnaes SL; King S; Greenwood JR; de la Maza LM
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1987 Feb; 6(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 3545656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enzyme immunoassay and enzyme-linked fluoroimmunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
Leinonen M; Saikku P; Nurminen M; Lassus A
Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Dec; 6(6):659-61. PubMed ID: 3326744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Chlamydia trachomatis: detection using a direct test and culture in 100 genital specimens].
Dutilh B; Bebear C
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1985; 43(3):275-8. PubMed ID: 3896054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assays in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis: how valid are they?
Weismeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Manduke L
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Apr; 9(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 3180707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of monoclonal antibody staining and culture in diagnosing cervical chlamydial infection.
Lipkin ES; Moncada JV; Shafer MA; Wilson TE; Schachter J
J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jan; 23(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 3517035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections by a monoclonal antibody direct immunofluorescence test.
Hossain A
J Trop Med Hyg; 1987 Dec; 90(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 3323545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
Monno R; De Vito D; Vena GA; Mosca A; Miragliotta G
Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter comparative evaluation of two rapid microscopic methods and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in patient specimens.
Tilton RC; Judson FN; Barnes RC; Gruninger RP; Ryan RW; Steingrimsson O
J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 3277994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
Ostergaard L; Møller JK
J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.
Fonseca K; Megran DW; Anand CM
J Clin Pathol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 7730479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chlamydia trachomatis in women: the more you look, the more you find.
Hay PE; Thomas BJ; Horner PJ; MacLeod E; Renton AM; Taylor-Robinson D
Genitourin Med; 1994 Apr; 70(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8206484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the Biostar Chlamydia OIA assay with specimens from women attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
Pate MS; Dixon PB; Hardy K; Crosby M; Hook EW
J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2183-6. PubMed ID: 9665987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]