These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3711447)

  • 1. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury.
    Schmiedt RA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 May; 79(5):1481-90. PubMed ID: 3711447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears.
    Zurek PM; Clark WW; Kim DO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):774-80. PubMed ID: 7130536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of furosemide on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and on neuronal responses in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus.
    Rübsamen R; Mills DM; Rubel EW
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Oct; 74(4):1628-38. PubMed ID: 8989399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ear canal acoustic distortion at 2f1-f2 from human ears: relation to other emissions and perceived combination tones.
    Furst M; Rabinowitz WM; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):215-21. PubMed ID: 3411050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones.
    Clark WW; Kim DO; Zurek PM; Bohne BA
    Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 16(3):299-314. PubMed ID: 6401089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct evidence of cubic difference tone propagation by intracochlear acoustic pressure measurements in the guinea-pig.
    Avan P; Magnan P; Smurzynski J; Probst R; Dancer A
    Eur J Neurosci; 1998 May; 10(5):1764-70. PubMed ID: 9751148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suppressibility of the 2f1-f2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man.
    Brown AM; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 6706860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Repeated TTS exposures in monkeys: alterations in hearing, cochlear structure, and single-unit thresholds.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK; Bohne BA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 May; 81(5):1507-18. PubMed ID: 3584688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Otoacoustic emissions and recruitment].
    Konopka W; Olszewski J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 2005; 59(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 16471192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils.
    Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1987 Nov; 31(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 3429348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stimulated acoustic emissions in the ear canal of the gerbil.
    Schmiedt RA; Adams JC
    Hear Res; 1981 Nov; 5(2-3):295-305. PubMed ID: 7309644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distortion product emissions in humans. I. Basic properties in normally hearing subjects.
    Lonsbury-Martin BL; Harris FP; Stagner BB; Hawkins MD; Martin GK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 147():3-14. PubMed ID: 2110797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Origin of cubic difference tones generated by high-intensity stimuli: effect of ischemia and auditory fatigue on the gerbil cochlea.
    Mom T; Bonfils P; Gilain L; Avan P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1477-88. PubMed ID: 11572358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear phenomena as observed in the ear canal and at the auditory nerve.
    Fahey PF; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 3973231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ear canal acoustic and round window electrical correlates of 2f1-f2 distortion generated in the cochlea.
    Kemp DT; Brown AM
    Hear Res; 1984 Jan; 13(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 6706861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions in White Leghorn chickens (Gallus domesticus): effects of frequency ratio and relative level.
    Burkard R; Salvi R; Chen L
    Audiol Neurootol; 1996; 1(4):197-213. PubMed ID: 9390802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The clinical use of oto-acoustic emissions of cochlear distortion products].
    Hauser R; Probst R; Harris FP
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1991 Mar; 70(3):123-31. PubMed ID: 2036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus.
    Janssen T; Kummer P; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3418-30. PubMed ID: 9637029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. II. Estimating tuning characteristics using three stimulus tones.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):507-23. PubMed ID: 9440336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating cochlear function and the effects of noise exposure in the B6.CAST+Ahl mouse with distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Vázquez AE; Jimenez AM; Martin GK; Luebke AE; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):87-96. PubMed ID: 15276680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.