BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37114985)

  • 1. Optimal biological dose selection in dose-finding trials with model-assisted designs based on efficacy and toxicity: a simulation study.
    Yamaguchi Y; Takeda K; Yoshida S; Maruo K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2024 May; 34(3):379-393. PubMed ID: 37114985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A utility-based Bayesian optimal interval (U-BOIN) phase I/II design to identify the optimal biological dose for targeted and immune therapies.
    Zhou Y; Lee JJ; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5299-5316. PubMed ID: 31621952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. TITE-BOIN12: A Bayesian phase I/II trial design to find the optimal biological dose with late-onset toxicity and efficacy.
    Zhou Y; Lin R; Lee JJ; Li D; Wang L; Li R; Yuan Y
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 35098585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. TEPI-2 and UBI: designs for optimal immuno-oncology and cell therapy dose finding with toxicity and efficacy.
    Li P; Liu R; Lin J; Ji Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 Nov; 30(6):979-992. PubMed ID: 32951518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative study of adaptive trial designs for dose optimization.
    Zhang J; Chen X; Li B; Yan F
    Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):797-814. PubMed ID: 37156731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CFO: Calibration-free odds design for phase I/II clinical trials.
    Jin H; Yin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Jun; 31(6):1051-1066. PubMed ID: 35238697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian adaptive model selection design for optimal biological dose finding in phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G; Shi H
    Biostatistics; 2023 Apr; 24(2):277-294. PubMed ID: 34296266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Bayesian adaptive Phase I-II clinical trial for evaluating efficacy and toxicity with delayed outcomes.
    Koopmeiners JS; Modiano J
    Clin Trials; 2014 Feb; 11(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 24082004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A software tool for both the maximum tolerated dose and the optimal biological dose finding trials in early phase designs.
    Li C; Sun H; Cheng C; Tang L; Pan H
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2022 Dec; 30():100990. PubMed ID: 36203850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 2D (2 Dimensional) TEQR design for Determining the optimal Dose for safety and efficacy.
    Ananthakrishnan R; Green S; Li D; LaValley M
    Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2019 Dec; 16():100461. PubMed ID: 31799471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. gBOIN-ET: The generalized Bayesian optimal interval design for optimal dose-finding accounting for ordinal graded efficacy and toxicity in early clinical trials.
    Takeda K; Morita S; Taguri M
    Biom J; 2022 Oct; 64(7):1178-1191. PubMed ID: 35561046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimal biological dose: a systematic review in cancer phase I clinical trials.
    Fraisse J; Dinart D; Tosi D; Bellera C; Mollevi C
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33441097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. BOIN-ET: Bayesian optimal interval design for dose finding based on both efficacy and toxicity outcomes.
    Takeda K; Taguri M; Morita S
    Pharm Stat; 2018 Jul; 17(4):383-395. PubMed ID: 29700965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BOIN12: Bayesian Optimal Interval Phase I/II Trial Design for Utility-Based Dose Finding in Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapies.
    Lin R; Zhou Y; Yan F; Li D; Yuan Y
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2020; 4():. PubMed ID: 33283133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the performance of copula models in phase I-II clinical trials under model misspecification.
    Cunanan K; Koopmeiners JS
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Apr; 14():51. PubMed ID: 24731155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian optimization design for dose-finding based on toxicity and efficacy outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials.
    Takahashi A; Suzuki T
    Pharm Stat; 2021 May; 20(3):422-439. PubMed ID: 33258282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. STEIN: A simple toxicity and efficacy interval design for seamless phase I/II clinical trials.
    Lin R; Yin G
    Stat Med; 2017 Nov; 36(26):4106-4120. PubMed ID: 28786138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sequential or combined designs for Phase I/II clinical trials? A simulation study.
    Rossoni C; Bardet A; Geoerger B; Paoletti X
    Clin Trials; 2019 Dec; 16(6):635-644. PubMed ID: 31538815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. TSNP: A two-stage nonparametric phase I/II clinical trial design for immunotherapy.
    Han Y; Liu H; Cao S; Zhang C; Zang Y
    Pharm Stat; 2021 Mar; 20(2):282-296. PubMed ID: 33025762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. uTPI: A utility-based toxicity probability interval design for phase I/II dose-finding trials.
    Shi H; Cao J; Yuan Y; Lin R
    Stat Med; 2021 May; 40(11):2626-2649. PubMed ID: 33650708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.