BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37116218)

  • 1. Sex-Biased Expression Is Associated With Chromatin State in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.
    Nanni AV; Martinez N; Graze R; Morse A; Newman JRB; Jain V; Vlaho S; Signor S; Nuzhdin SV; Renne R; McIntyre LM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2023 May; 40(5):. PubMed ID: 37116218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sex-biased expression is associated with chromatin state in
    Nanni AV; Martinez N; Graze R; Morse A; Newman JRB; Jain V; Vlaho S; Signor S; Nuzhdin SV; Renne R; McIntyre LM
    bioRxiv; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36711631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in the Drosophila ananassae subgroup.
    Grath S; Baines JF; Parsch J
    BMC Evol Biol; 2009 Dec; 9():291. PubMed ID: 20015359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection shapes turnover and magnitude of sex-biased expression in Drosophila gonads.
    Whittle CA; Extavour CG
    BMC Evol Biol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):60. PubMed ID: 30786879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Molecular evolution of sex-biased genes in Drosophila.
    Zhang Z; Hambuch TM; Parsch J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Nov; 21(11):2130-9. PubMed ID: 15282334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The chromatin landscape of Drosophila: comparisons between species, sexes, and chromosomes.
    Brown EJ; Bachtrog D
    Genome Res; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1125-37. PubMed ID: 24840603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rates of DNA sequence evolution are not sex-biased in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Bauer VL; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 1997 Dec; 14(12):1252-7. PubMed ID: 9402735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing the Drosophila maternal haploid gene for functional divergence and a role in hybrid incompatibility.
    Castillo DM; McCormick B; Kean CM; Natesan S; Barbash DA
    G3 (Bethesda); 2022 Aug; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 35876798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Molecular evolution between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins in D. melanogaster.
    Akashi H
    Genetics; 1996 Nov; 144(3):1297-307. PubMed ID: 8913769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Widespread adaptive evolution of Drosophila genes with sex-biased expression.
    Pröschel M; Zhang Z; Parsch J
    Genetics; 2006 Oct; 174(2):893-900. PubMed ID: 16951084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolution and genetics of accessory gland transcriptome divergence between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Majane AC; Cridland JM; Blair LK; Begun DJ
    Genetics; 2024 Jun; 227(2):. PubMed ID: 38518250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sex-biased transcriptome divergence along a latitudinal gradient.
    Allen SL; Bonduriansky R; Sgro CM; Chenoweth SF
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Mar; 26(5):1256-1272. PubMed ID: 28100025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Quantitative, Genome-Wide Analysis in Drosophila Reveals Transposable Elements' Influence on Gene Expression Is Species-Specific.
    Fablet M; Salces-Ortiz J; Jacquet A; Menezes BF; Dechaud C; Veber P; Rebollo R; Vieira C
    Genome Biol Evol; 2023 Sep; 15(9):. PubMed ID: 37652057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for a force favoring GC over AT at short intronic sites in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Jackson B; Charlesworth B
    G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34544137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative study of natural variation in hemolymph glucose levels under different dietary sugar conditions in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Inomata N; Miyazaki M; Noguchi M; Itoh M
    Genes Genet Syst; 2023 Feb; 97(5):221-227. PubMed ID: 36464279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential responses to artificial selection on oviposition site preferences in Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Soto EM; Betti MI; Hurtado J; Hasson E
    Insect Sci; 2015 Dec; 22(6):821-8. PubMed ID: 25263841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative population genomics of latitudinal variation in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Machado HE; Bergland AO; O'Brien KR; Behrman EL; Schmidt PS; Petrov DA
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(3):723-40. PubMed ID: 26523848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DNA Motifs Are Not General Predictors of Recombination in Two Drosophila Sister Species.
    Howie JM; Mazzucco R; Taus T; Nolte V; Schlötterer C
    Genome Biol Evol; 2019 Apr; 11(4):1345-1357. PubMed ID: 30980655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No accelerated rate of protein evolution in male-biased Drosophila pseudoobscura genes.
    Metta M; Gudavalli R; Gibert JM; Schlötterer C
    Genetics; 2006 Sep; 174(1):411-20. PubMed ID: 16816428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The genetic basis of female pheromone differences between Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans.
    Pardy JA; Rundle HD; Bernards MA; Moehring AJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Jan; 122(1):93-109. PubMed ID: 29777168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.