These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37116389)
1. Simulated and experimental phantom data for multi-center quality assurance of quantitative susceptibility maps at 3 T, 7 T and 9.4 T. Gustavo Cuña E; Schulz H; Tuzzi E; Biagi L; Bosco P; García-Fontes M; Mattos J; Tosetti M; Engelmann J; Scheffler K; Hagberg GE Phys Med; 2023 Jun; 110():102590. PubMed ID: 37116389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI estimates of brain iron concentration in normal aging using quantitative susceptibility mapping. Bilgic B; Pfefferbaum A; Rohlfing T; Sullivan EV; Adalsteinsson E Neuroimage; 2012 Feb; 59(3):2625-35. PubMed ID: 21925274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative susceptibility mapping across two clinical field strengths: Contrast-to-noise ratio enhancement at 1.5T. Ippoliti M; Adams LC; Winfried B; Hamm B; Spincemaille P; Wang Y; Makowski MR J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1410-1420. PubMed ID: 29659131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative susceptibility mapping in a gadolinium phantom using MEDI+0 automatic zero referencing. Deh K; Kawaji K; Bulk M; Van Der Weerd L; Lind E; Spincemaille P; McCabe Gillen K; Van Auderkerke J; Wang Y; Nguyen TD Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):1229-1236. PubMed ID: 30284727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blip up-down acquisition for spin- and gradient-echo imaging (BUDA-SAGE) with self-supervised denoising enables efficient T Zhang Z; Cho J; Wang L; Liao C; Shin HG; Cao X; Lee J; Xu J; Zhang T; Ye H; Setsompop K; Liu H; Bilgic B Magn Reson Med; 2022 Aug; 88(2):633-650. PubMed ID: 35436357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-centre, multi-vendor reproducibility of 7T QSM and R Rua C; Clarke WT; Driver ID; Mougin O; Morgan AT; Clare S; Francis S; Muir KW; Wise RG; Carpenter TA; Williams GB; Rowe JB; Bowtell R; Rodgers CT Neuroimage; 2020 Dec; 223():117358. PubMed ID: 32916289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Background field removal using a region adaptive kernel for quantitative susceptibility mapping of human brain. Fang J; Bao L; Li X; van Zijl PCM; Chen Z J Magn Reson; 2017 Aug; 281():130-140. PubMed ID: 28595120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging beta amyloid aggregation and iron accumulation in Alzheimer's disease using quantitative susceptibility mapping MRI. Gong NJ; Dibb R; Bulk M; van der Weerd L; Liu C Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():176-185. PubMed ID: 30739060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Free-breathing high isotropic resolution quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) of liver using 3D multi-echo UTE cones acquisition and respiratory motion-resolved image reconstruction. Kang M; Behr GG; Jafari R; Gambarin M; Otazo R; Kee Y Magn Reson Med; 2023 Nov; 90(5):1844-1858. PubMed ID: 37392413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multi-echo quantitative susceptibility mapping: how to combine echoes for accuracy and precision at 3 Tesla. Biondetti E; Karsa A; Grussu F; Battiston M; Yiannakas MC; Thomas DL; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2022 Nov; 88(5):2101-2116. PubMed ID: 35766450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward a realistic in silico abdominal phantom for QSM. Silva J; Milovic C; Lambert M; Montalba C; Arrieta C; Irarrazaval P; Uribe S; Tejos C Magn Reson Med; 2023 Jun; 89(6):2402-2418. PubMed ID: 36695213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigating the accuracy and precision of TE-dependent versus multi-echo QSM using Laplacian-based methods at 3 T. Biondetti E; Karsa A; Thomas DL; Shmueli K Magn Reson Med; 2020 Dec; 84(6):3040-3053. PubMed ID: 32491224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simultaneous quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and R2* for high iron concentration quantification with 3D ultrashort echo time sequences: An echo dependence study. Lu X; Ma Y; Chang EY; He Q; Searleman A; von Drygalski A; Du J Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2315-2322. PubMed ID: 29314215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) algorithm for quantitative susceptibility mapping in MRI. Liu T; Xu W; Spincemaille P; Avestimehr AS; Wang Y IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Mar; 31(3):816-24. PubMed ID: 22231170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human brain atlas for automated region of interest selection in quantitative susceptibility mapping: application to determine iron content in deep gray matter structures. Lim IA; Faria AV; Li X; Hsu JT; Airan RD; Mori S; van Zijl PC Neuroimage; 2013 Nov; 82():449-69. PubMed ID: 23769915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Echo-time dependency of quantitative susceptibility mapping reproducibility at different magnetic field strengths. Lancione M; Donatelli G; Cecchi P; Cosottini M; Tosetti M; Costagli M Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():557-564. PubMed ID: 31075389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]