These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37116736)

  • 1. Toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic mixture effects of plant protection products: A case study.
    Karaca M; Willenbockel CT; Tralau T; Bloch D; Marx-Stoelting P
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Jun; 141():105400. PubMed ID: 37116736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of co-formulants on the absorption and secretion of active substances in plant protection products in vitro.
    Karaca M; Fischer BC; Willenbockel CT; Tralau T; Marx-Stoelting P; Bloch D
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Oct; 95(10):3205-3221. PubMed ID: 34417632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mixture effects of co-formulants and two plant protection products in a liver cell line.
    Feiertag K; Karaca M; Fischer B; Heise T; Bloch D; Opialla T; Tralau T; Kneuer C; Marx-Stoelting P
    EXCLI J; 2023; 22():221-236. PubMed ID: 36998705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Towards a tiered test strategy for plant protection products to address mixture toxicity by alternative approaches in human health assessment.
    Bloch D; Marx-Stoelting P; Martin S
    Pest Manag Sci; 2020 Oct; 76(10):3326-3332. PubMed ID: 32770639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More than additive effects on liver triglyceride accumulation by combinations of steatotic and non-steatotic pesticides in HepaRG cells.
    Lasch A; Marx-Stoelting P; Braeuning A; Lichtenstein D
    Arch Toxicol; 2021 Apr; 95(4):1397-1411. PubMed ID: 33575850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative cytotoxicity of plant protection products and their active ingredients.
    Adler-Flindt S; Martin S
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Feb; 54():354-366. PubMed ID: 30389606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative assessment of the CLP calculation method and in vivo testing for the classification of plant protection products.
    Kurth D; Wend K; Adler-Flindt S; Martin S
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Feb; 101():79-90. PubMed ID: 30471334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mixture effects of two plant protection products in liver cell lines.
    Zahn E; Wolfrum J; Knebel C; Heise T; Weiß F; Poetz O; Marx-Stoelting P; Rieke S
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2018 Feb; 112():299-309. PubMed ID: 29294346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of biotic ligand and toxicokinetic-toxicodynamic modeling to predict the accumulation and toxicity of metal mixtures to zebrafish larvae.
    Gao Y; Feng J; Han F; Zhu L
    Environ Pollut; 2016 Jun; 213():16-29. PubMed ID: 26874871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of the composition of plant protection products in different formulation types employing suspect screening and unknown approaches.
    Hergueta-Castillo ME; López-Ruiz R; Garrido Frenich A; Romero-González R
    J Sci Food Agric; 2022 Oct; 102(13):5995-6004. PubMed ID: 35451129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of the fentanyl homologs cyclopropanoyl-1-benzyl-4´-fluoro-4-anilinopiperidine and furanoyl-1-benzyl-4-anilinopiperidine.
    Gampfer TM; Wagmann L; Park YM; Cannaert A; Herrmann J; Fischmann S; Westphal F; Müller R; Stove CP; Meyer MR
    Arch Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 94(6):2009-2025. PubMed ID: 32249346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analyses of cellular physiological responses of non-target species to cypermethrin and its formulated product: Contribution to mode of action research.
    Kaisarevic S; Tenji D; Mihajlovic V; Micic B; Francija E; Periz-Stanacev J; Krnic Skiljo B; Brkic D; Teodorovic I
    Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Jan; 65():31-39. PubMed ID: 30502548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the enantioselective in vitro metabolism of the chiral pesticide fipronil employing a human model: Risk assessment through in vitro-in vivo correlation and prediction of toxicokinetic parameters.
    Carrão DB; Dos Reis Gomes IC; Barbosa Junior F; de Oliveira ARM
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2019 Jan; 123():225-232. PubMed ID: 30385190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cytochrome P450 1A2 Messenger RNA is a More Reliable Marker than Cytochrome P450 1A2 Activity, Phenacetin O-Deethylation, for Assessment of Induction Potential of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes Using HepaRG Cells.
    Ogasawara A; Kato N; Torimoto N; Aohara F; Ohashi R; Yamada Y; Taniguchi H
    Drug Metab Lett; 2018; 12(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 29357810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Yin-Yang of CYP3A4: a Bayesian meta-analysis to quantify inhibition and induction of CYP3A4 metabolism in humans and refine uncertainty factors for mixture risk assessment.
    Quignot N; Wiecek W; Amzal B; Dorne JL
    Arch Toxicol; 2019 Jan; 93(1):107-119. PubMed ID: 30298208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enantioselective mixture toxicity of the azole fungicide imazalil with the insecticide α-cypermethrin in Chironomus riparius: Investigating the importance of toxicokinetics and enzyme interactions.
    Kuhlmann J; Kretschmann AC; Bester K; Bollmann UE; Dalhoff K; Cedergreen N
    Chemosphere; 2019 Jun; 225():166-173. PubMed ID: 30875499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interactions of endosulfan and methoxychlor involving CYP3A4 and CYP2B6 in human HepaRG cells.
    Savary CC; Jossé R; Bruyère A; Guillet F; Robin MA; Guillouzo A
    Drug Metab Dispos; 2014 Aug; 42(8):1235-40. PubMed ID: 24832206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toxicokinetic Studies and Analytical Toxicology of the New Synthetic Opioids Cyclopentanoyl-Fentanyl and Tetrahydrofuranoyl-Fentanyl.
    Gampfer TM; Wagmann L; Richter MJ; Fischmann S; Westphal F; Meyer MR
    J Anal Toxicol; 2020 Apr; 44(5):449-460. PubMed ID: 32020187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ecotoxicological assessment of the herbicide Winner Top and its active substances-are the other formulants truly inert?
    Queirós L; Vidal T; Nogueira AJA; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
    Ecotoxicology; 2018 Sep; 27(7):945-955. PubMed ID: 29725885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scientific Opinion on the state of the art of Toxicokinetic/Toxicodynamic (TKTD) effect models for regulatory risk assessment of pesticides for aquatic organisms.
    ; Ockleford C; Adriaanse P; Berny P; Brock T; Duquesne S; Grilli S; Hernandez-Jerez AF; Bennekou SH; Klein M; Kuhl T; Laskowski R; Machera K; Pelkonen O; Pieper S; Smith RH; Stemmer M; Sundh I; Tiktak A; Topping CJ; Wolterink G; Cedergreen N; Charles S; Focks A; Reed M; Arena M; Ippolito A; Byers H; Teodorovic I
    EFSA J; 2018 Aug; 16(8):e05377. PubMed ID: 32626020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.