These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh: proportional meta-analysis. Morales-Conde S; Hernández-Granados P; Tallón-Aguilar L; Verdaguer-Tremolosa M; López-Cano M Hernia; 2022 Dec; 26(6):1459-1471. PubMed ID: 36098869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes with porcine acellular dermal matrix versus synthetic mesh and suture in complicated open ventral hernia repair. Liang MK; Berger RL; Nguyen MT; Hicks SC; Li LT; Leong M Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2014 Oct; 15(5):506-12. PubMed ID: 25215466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter, Prospective, Longitudinal Study of the Recurrence, Surgical Site Infection, and Quality of Life After Contaminated Ventral Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Absorbable Mesh: The COBRA Study. Rosen MJ; Bauer JJ; Harmaty M; Carbonell AM; Cobb WS; Matthews B; Goldblatt MI; Selzer DJ; Poulose BK; Hansson BM; Rosman C; Chao JJ; Jacobsen GR Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):205-211. PubMed ID: 28009747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term outcomes of PGA-TMC absorbable synthetic scaffold in both clean and contaminated ventral hernia repairs. Huang EY; Broderick RC; Spurzem GJ; Li JZ; Blitzer RR; Cheverie JN; Sandler BJ; Horgan S; Jacobsen GR Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):2231-2239. PubMed ID: 38498213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of outcomes and cost in VHWG grade II hernias between Rives-Stoppa synthetic mesh hernia repair versus underlay biologic mesh repair. Fischer JP; Basta MN; Mirzabeigi MN; Kovach SJ Hernia; 2014; 18(6):781-9. PubMed ID: 25249250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ventral hernia repair using bioresorbable poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh in clean and contaminated surgical fields: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ahmed A; Gandhi S; Ganam S; Diab AF; Mhaskar R; Sujka J; DuCoin C; Docimo S Hernia; 2024 Apr; 28(2):575-584. PubMed ID: 38345668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of synthetic mesh in contaminated and infected abdominal wall repairs: challenging the dogma-A long-term prospective clinical trial. Birolini C; de Miranda JS; Tanaka EY; Utiyama EM; Rasslan S; Birolini D Hernia; 2020 Apr; 24(2):307-323. PubMed ID: 31493051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. Majumder A; Winder JS; Wen Y; Pauli EM; Belyansky I; Novitsky YW Surgery; 2016 Oct; 160(4):828-838. PubMed ID: 27452954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel biosynthetic scaffold mesh reinforcement affords the lowest hernia recurrence in the highest-risk patients. Parker MJ; Kim RC; Barrio M; Socas J; Reed LR; Nakeeb A; House MG; Ceppa EP Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5173-5178. PubMed ID: 32970208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergent and urgent ventral hernia repair: comparing recurrence rates amongst procedures utilizing mesh versus no mesh. Whittaker R; Lewis Z; Plymale MA; Nisiewicz M; Ebunoluwa A; Davenport DL; Reynolds JK; Roth JS Surg Endosc; 2022 Oct; 36(10):7731-7737. PubMed ID: 35233657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]