BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37118647)

  • 1. Dynamic structural equation models with binary and ordinal outcomes in Mplus.
    McNeish D; Somers JA; Savord A
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1506-1532. PubMed ID: 37118647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intensive longitudinal mediation in Mplus.
    McNeish D; MacKinnon DP
    Psychol Methods; 2022 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 36548080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement in Intensive Longitudinal Data.
    McNeish D; Mackinnon DP; Marsch LA; Poldrack RA
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2021; 28(5):807-822. PubMed ID: 34737528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of Latent Growth Curve Analysis with Categorical Responses in Social Behavioral Research.
    Lee TK; Wickrama KKAS; O'Neal CW
    Struct Equ Modeling; 2018; 25(2):294-306. PubMed ID: 31097902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigating Moderation Effects at the Within-Person Level Using Intensive Longitudinal Data: A Two-Level Dynamic Structural Equation Modelling Approach in Mplus.
    Speyer LG; Murray AL; Kievit R
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2024; 59(3):620-637. PubMed ID: 38356288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified framework for the comparison of treatments with ordinal responses.
    Lu TY; Poon WY; Cheung SH
    Psychometrika; 2014 Oct; 79(4):605-20. PubMed ID: 24288031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. At the Frontiers of Modeling Intensive Longitudinal Data: Dynamic Structural Equation Models for the Affective Measurements from the COGITO Study.
    Hamaker EL; Asparouhov T; Brose A; Schmiedek F; Muthén B
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):820-841. PubMed ID: 29624092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing multiple statistical software for multiple-indicator, multiple-cause modeling: an application of gender disparity in adult cognitive functioning using MIDUS II dataset.
    Chang C; Gardiner J; Houang R; Yu YL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):275. PubMed ID: 33183226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the Mplus computer program to estimate models for continuous and categorical data from twins.
    Prescott CA
    Behav Genet; 2004 Jan; 34(1):17-40. PubMed ID: 14739694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Design of pharmacokinetic studies for latent covariates.
    Lagishetty CV; Coulter CV; Duffull SB
    J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2012 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 22161222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ordered Regression Models: a Tutorial.
    Fullerton AS; Anderson KF
    Prev Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(3):431-443. PubMed ID: 34780007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating Structural Equation Models for Categorical Outcomes: A New Test Statistic and a Practical Challenge of Interpretation.
    Monroe S; Cai L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(6):569-83. PubMed ID: 26717119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling with Categorical Data.
    Savalei V
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 32054327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Poisson versus threshold models for genetic analysis of clinical mastitis in US Holsteins.
    Vazquez AI; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Bates DM; Perez-Cabal MA; Rosa GJ; Chang YM
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5239-47. PubMed ID: 19762842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Testing measurement invariance in longitudinal data with ordered-categorical measures.
    Liu Y; Millsap RE; West SG; Tein JY; Tanaka R; Grimm KJ
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):486-506. PubMed ID: 27213981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A joint normal-ordinal (probit) model for ordinal and continuous longitudinal data.
    Delporte M; Molenberghs G; Fieuws S; Verbeke G
    Biostatistics; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38869057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus.
    McNeish D; Hamaker EL
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Oct; 25(5):610-635. PubMed ID: 31855015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.
    Culpepper SA
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):921-940. PubMed ID: 31432312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.