These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37119000)
1. Improved inference for MCP-Mod approach using time-to-event endpoints with small sample sizes. Diniz MA; Gallardo DI; Magalhães TM Pharm Stat; 2023; 22(5):760-772. PubMed ID: 37119000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power and sample size for dose-finding studies with survival endpoints under model uncertainty. Deng Q; Bai X; Liu D; Roy D; Ying Z; Lin DY Biometrics; 2019 Mar; 75(1):308-314. PubMed ID: 30203467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes. Li P; Redden DT Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous inference for multiple marginal generalized estimating equation models. Ristl R; Hothorn L; Ritz C; Posch M Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Jun; 29(6):1746-1762. PubMed ID: 31526178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Confirmatory efficacy testing for individual dose-placebo comparisons using serial gatekeeping procedure in dose-finding trials with multiple comparison procedures-modeling. Yamaguchi Y; Sugitani T; Yoshida S; Maruo K Pharm Stat; 2022 Nov; 21(6):1309-1323. PubMed ID: 35708144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations (GEE) in longitudinal analysis with small samples. Wang M; Kong L; Li Z; Zhang L Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(10):1706-21. PubMed ID: 26585756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simulation study for comparing testing statistics in response-adaptive randomization. Gu X; Lee JJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Jun; 10():48. PubMed ID: 20525382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Combination MCP-Mod for two-drug combination dose-ranging studies. Zhou Y; Sloan A; Menon S; Wang L J Biopharm Stat; 2024 Feb; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38335371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of bias-adjusted generalized estimating equations for sparse binary data in small-sample longitudinal studies. Gosho M; Ishii R; Noma H; Maruo K Stat Med; 2023 Jul; 42(15):2711-2727. PubMed ID: 37062288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Covariate-adjusted generalized pairwise comparisons in small samples. Jaspers S; Verbeeck J; Thas O Stat Med; 2024 Sep; 43(21):4027-4042. PubMed ID: 38963080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes. Westgate PM Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators. Zivich PN; Breskin A Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties. Mancl LA; DeRouen TA Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 11252587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Kenward-Roger-type corrections for inference methods of network meta-analysis and meta-regression. Noma H; Hamura Y; Gosho M; Furukawa TA Res Synth Methods; 2023 Sep; 14(5):731-741. PubMed ID: 37399845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of bias-corrected empirical covariance estimators with generalized estimating equations in small-sample longitudinal study settings. Ford WP; Westgate PM Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4318-4329. PubMed ID: 30073684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical considerations on implementing the MCP-Mod method for binary endpoints in clinical trials. Chen J; Liu T Contemp Clin Trials Commun; 2020 Sep; 19():100641. PubMed ID: 32875139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Semiparametric inference for surrogate endpoints with bivariate censored data. Ghosh D Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 17651457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts. Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]