These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37120090)
1. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology. Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques. Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies. Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis. Emir F; Ayyildiz S J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology. Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of additively manufactured and steam sterilized surgical guides by means of continuous liquid interface production, stereolithography, digital light processing, and fused filament fabrication. Burkhardt F; Handermann L; Rothlauf S; Gintaute A; Vach K; Spies BC; Lüchtenborg J J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106418. PubMed ID: 38295512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base. Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts. Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3-dimensional printing technologies on the precision, trueness, and accuracy of printed retainers. Naeem OA; Bencharit S; Yang IH; Stilianoudakis SC; Carrico C; Tüfekçi E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Apr; 161(4):582-591. PubMed ID: 35337648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts. Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies. Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the accuracy of intraoral scanners for complete-arch scanning: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Vitai V; Németh A; Sólyom E; Czumbel LM; Szabó B; Fazekas R; Gerber G; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104636. PubMed ID: 37516338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing. de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used. Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Nov; 132(5):995-1004. PubMed ID: 36690552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of 3D printed orthodontic models finalized to clear aligners production, testing crowded and spaced dentition. Grassia V; Ronsivalle V; Isola G; Nucci L; Leonardi R; Lo Giudice A BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):352. PubMed ID: 37268910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study. Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of printing technology, layer height, and orientation on assessment of 3D-printed models. ElShebiny T; Matthaios S; Menezes LM; Tsolakis IA; Palomo JM J World Fed Orthod; 2024 Aug; 13(4):169-174. PubMed ID: 38670838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates. Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]