These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37120978)

  • 1. Application of extrusion-based 3D food printing to regulate marbling patterns of restructured beef steak.
    Park JW; Lee SH; Kim HW; Park HJ
    Meat Sci; 2023 Aug; 202():109203. PubMed ID: 37120978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer visual preference and value for beef steaks differing in marbling level and color.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3288-93. PubMed ID: 15542475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consumer sensory acceptance and value for beef steaks of similar tenderness, but differing in marbling level.
    Killinger KM; Calkins CR; Umberger WJ; Feuz DM; Eskridge KM
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Nov; 82(11):3294-301. PubMed ID: 15542476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of marbling and shear force on consumers' willingness to pay for beef strip loin steaks.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Koontz SR; Chapman PL; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Apr; 83(4):890-9. PubMed ID: 15753345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics between beef marbling grades and its effect on sensory quality characteristics in high-marbled Hanwoo steer.
    Lee B; Yoon S; Choi YM
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():109-115. PubMed ID: 30844620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Consumer preferences for beef with improved nutrient profile1.
    Flowers S; McFadden BR; Carr CC; Mateescu RG
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4699-4709. PubMed ID: 31628839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks.
    Goodson KJ; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Courington SM; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Feb; 80(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 11881929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eating quality prediction of beef from Italian Simmental cattle based on experts' steak assessment.
    Borgogno M; Saccà E; Corazzin M; Favotto S; Bovolenta S; Piasentier E
    Meat Sci; 2016 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 26998946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of chemical intramuscular fat and visual marbling scores with a conveyor vision scanner system on beef portion steaks.
    Pannier L; van de Weijer TM; van der Steen FTHJ; Kranenbarg R; Gardner GE
    Meat Sci; 2023 May; 199():109141. PubMed ID: 36827827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-Cultural Consumer Acceptability and Purchase Intent of Forage-Finished Rib-Eye Steaks.
    Torrico DD; Wardy W; Pujols KD; Carabante KM; Jirangrat W; Scaglia G; Janes ME; Prinyawiwatkul W
    J Food Sci; 2015 Oct; 80(10):S2287-95. PubMed ID: 26408954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beef customer satisfaction: USDA quality grade and marination effects on consumer evaluations of top round steaks.
    Behrends JM; Goodson KJ; Koohmaraie M; Shackelford SD; Wheeler TL; Morgan WW; Reagan JO; Gwartney BL; Wise JW; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Mar; 83(3):662-70. PubMed ID: 15705763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-processing feasibility of composite-layer 3D printed beef.
    Dick A; Bhandari B; Prakash S
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jul; 153():9-18. PubMed ID: 30856550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Adding value to beef portion steaks through measuring individual marbling.
    Pannier L; van de Weijer TM; van der Steen FTHJ; Kranenbarg R; Gardner GE
    Meat Sci; 2023 Oct; 204():109279. PubMed ID: 37467681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification and characterization of Japanese consumers' beef preferences by external preference mapping.
    Sasaki K; Ooi M; Nagura N; Motoyama M; Narita T; Oe M; Nakajima I; Hagi T; Ojima K; Kobayashi M; Nomura M; Muroya S; Hayashi T; Akama K; Fujikawa A; Hokiyama H; Kobayashi K; Nishimura T
    J Sci Food Agric; 2017 Aug; 97(10):3453-3462. PubMed ID: 28071797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U. S. consumer perceptions of U. S. and Canadian beef quality grades.
    Tedford JL; Rodas-González A; Garmyn AJ; Brooks JC; Johnson BJ; Starkey JD; Clark GO; Derington AJ; Collins JA; Miller MF
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3685-92. PubMed ID: 24802035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships of consumer sensory ratings, marbling score, and shear force value to consumer acceptance of beef strip loin steaks.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Chapman PL; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Nov; 81(11):2741-50. PubMed ID: 14601877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of repetitive use of hormonal implants on beef carcass quality, tenderness, and consumer ratings of beef palatability.
    Platter WJ; Tatum JD; Belk KE; Scanga JA; Smith GC
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Apr; 81(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 12723088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.