These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37121569)

  • 1. Dobbs vs. Jackson Supreme Court ruling: a stimulant of male reproductive responsibility.
    Dietrich PN; Sandlow JI
    Fertil Steril; 2023 Jul; 120(1):198. PubMed ID: 37121569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion pill marketing and sourcing on twitter following Dobbs v. Jackson supreme court ruling.
    McMann TJ; Haupt MR; Le N; Meurice ME; Li J; Cuomo RE; Mackey TK
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2024 Aug; 29(4):139-144. PubMed ID: 38780176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Society for Medical Anthropology Statement on Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Buchbinder M; Mishtal J; Singer EO; Wendland CL
    Med Anthropol Q; 2022 Dec; 36(4):433-441. PubMed ID: 36433774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion.
    Macklin R
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6.
    Kulczycki A
    Health Educ Behav; 2022 Dec; 49(6):924-928. PubMed ID: 36173003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Managing Undesired Pregnancy After Dobbs.
    Casas RS; Horvath SK; Schwarz EB; Bachorik AE; Chuang CC
    J Gen Intern Med; 2022 Dec; 37(16):4272-4275. PubMed ID: 36220947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On Interpretation and Appreciation. A European Human Rights Perspective on
    Buijsen M
    Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2023 Jul; 32(3):323-336. PubMed ID: 36688281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Legal Risks and Ethical Dilemmas for Clinicians in the Aftermath of Dobbs.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO; Goodwin MB
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1695-1696. PubMed ID: 36318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive justice for disabled people post-Dobbs: A call-to-action for researchers.
    Powell RM
    Disabil Health J; 2024 Apr; 17(2):101572. PubMed ID: 38071137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.
    Feinberg EC; Kawwass JF; Cedars MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Oct; 140(4):557-559. PubMed ID: 35861359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Requests for Self-managed Medication Abortion Provided Using Online Telemedicine in 30 US States Before and After the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization Decision.
    Aiken ARA; Starling JE; Scott JG; Gomperts R
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1768-1770. PubMed ID: 36318139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.
    Shalev C
    Isr J Health Policy Res; 2023 Jan; 12(1):3. PubMed ID: 36694241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law.
    Denniston L
    Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The United States Supreme Court ruling and women's reproductive rights - A position statement issued by The European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG).
    Louwen F; Mukhopadhyay S; Mahmood T; Martins NN; Tarlatzis B;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Dec; 279():130-131. PubMed ID: 36334375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of the Dobbs decision on marginalized populations: Letter in reply to "The Supreme Court abortion ban impact on dermatology".
    Khanna R; Khanna R; Larson AR
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 May; 88(5):e287-e288. PubMed ID: 36528269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associations between state policies, race, ethnicity and rurality, and maternal mortality and morbidity following the United States Supreme Court Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization ruling.
    Williams AM; Chaturvedi R; Pollalis I; Ibarra-Cobarru J; Aaronson JA; White RS
    Br J Anaesth; 2022 Dec; 129(6):e145-e147. PubMed ID: 36163076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of the Dobbs decision on in-vitro fertilization and fertility care.
    Ulker A; Evans MB; Craig LB
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Aug; 35(4):306-310. PubMed ID: 37266567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Challenge of Emergency Abortion Care Following the Dobbs Ruling.
    MacDonald A; Gershengorn HB; Ashana DC
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1691-1692. PubMed ID: 36318126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advancing Birth Equity in a Post-Dobbs US.
    Crear-Perry J; Hassan A; Daniel S
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1689-1690. PubMed ID: 36318120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.