137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37122247)
1. Modified Collard technique is more effective than circular stapled for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a propensity score-matched study.
Takeoka T; Miyata H; Sugimura K; Kanemura T; Sugase T; Yamamoto M; Shinno N; Hara H; Fujii Y; Mukai Y; Asukai K; Mikamori M; Hasegawa S; Akita H; Haraguchi N; Nishimura J; Wada H; Matsuda C; Omori T; Yasui M; Ohue M; Yano M
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Apr; 36(5):. PubMed ID: 37122247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Totally mechanical Collard versus circular stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Liu H; Shan L; Wang J; Zhai R; Zhu Y; Yao F
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):891-901. PubMed ID: 36038647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Totally Mechanical Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis Reduces Stricture Formation Compared with Circular Stapled Anastomosis.
Hirano Y; Fujita T; Sato K; Kurita D; Sato T; Ishiyama K; Fujiwara H; Oguma J; Daiko H
World J Surg; 2020 Dec; 44(12):4175-4183. PubMed ID: 32783124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of hand-sewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomoses in the neck after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Ozawa H; Kawakubo H; Nishimura E; Matsuda S; Takemura R; Irino T; Fukuda K; Nakamura R; Wada N; Kitagawa Y
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Feb; 36(3):. PubMed ID: 36222073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the modified Collard and hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Sugimura K; Miyata H; Matsunaga T; Asukai K; Yanagimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Tomokuni A; Yamamoto K; Hirofumi A; Nishimura J; Motoori M; Wada H; Takahashi H; Yasui M; Omori T; Ohue M; Yano M
Ann Gastroenterol Surg; 2019 Jan; 3(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 30697615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Circular Stapler Size on the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Stricture After Esophagectomy.
Hosoi T; Abe T; Uemura N; Higaki E; Kawai R; Kawakami J; An B; Nagino M; Shimizu Y
World J Surg; 2019 Jul; 43(7):1746-1755. PubMed ID: 30847524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Modified Collard versus end-to-side hand-sewn anastomosis for cervical anastomosis after McKeown esophagectomy.
Li XK; Xu Y; Cong ZZ; Luo J; Zhou H; Ji SG; Diao YF; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Qian JJ; Shen Y
Thorac Cancer; 2020 Oct; 11(10):2909-2915. PubMed ID: 32833352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies.
Price TN; Nichols FC; Harmsen WS; Allen MS; Cassivi SD; Wigle DA; Shen KR; Deschamps C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Apr; 95(4):1154-60; discussion 1160-1. PubMed ID: 23395626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Circular Stapler Method for Avoiding Stricture of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
Shiraishi O; Yasuda T; Kato H; Momose K; Hiraki Y; Yasuda A; Shinkai M; Imano M
J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Apr; 26(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 35138510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gu HY; Luo J; Qiang Y
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Aug; 18(1):242. PubMed ID: 37559141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anastomotic leak and stricture after hand-sewn versus linear-stapled intrathoracic oesophagogastric anastomosis: single-centre analysis of 415 oesophagectomies.
Harustiak T; Pazdro A; Snajdauf M; Stolz A; Lischke R
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1650-9. PubMed ID: 26574497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
