129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37122909)
1. Validation of esophageal cancer treatment methods from 3D-CRT, IMRT, and Rapid Arc plans using custom Python software to compare radiobiological plans to normal tissue integral dosage.
Dashnamoorthy S; Jeyasingh E; Rajamanickam K
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2023; 28(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 37122909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic Radiobiological Comparison of Radiation Therapy Plans: An Application to Gastric Cancer.
Mazonakis M; Tzanis E; Lyraraki E; Damilakis J
Cancers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 36551582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration of radiobiological modeling and indices in comparative plan evaluation: A study comparing VMAT and 3D-CRT in patients with NSCLC.
Roy S; Badragan I; Ahmed SN; Sia M; Singh J; Bahl G
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e355-e363. PubMed ID: 29703705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric and radiobiological comparison in head-and-neck radiotherapy using JO-IMRT and 3D-CRT.
Tai DT; Oanh LT; Phuong PH; Sulieman A; Abolaban FA; Omer H; Chow JCL
Saudi J Biol Sci; 2022 Aug; 29(8):103336. PubMed ID: 35754762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a Hybrid IMRT/VMAT technique with non-coplanar VMAT and non-coplanar IMRT for unresectable olfactory neuroblastoma using the RayStation treatment planning system-EUD, NTCP and planning study.
Raturi VP; Motegi A; Zenda S; Nakamura N; Hojo H; Kageyama SI; Okumura M; Rachi T; Ohyoshi H; Tachibana H; Motegi K; Ariji T; Nakamura M; Hirano Y; Hirata H; Akimoto T
J Radiat Res; 2021 May; 62(3):540-548. PubMed ID: 33839761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Radiobiological Models for Radiation Therapy Plans of Prostate Cancer: Three-dimensional Conformal versus Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy.
A M; N R; M M; B NM; H OT
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2019 Jun; 9(3):267-278. PubMed ID: 31341872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential for reduced toxicity and dose escalation in the treatment of inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: a comparison of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D conformal radiation, and elective nodal irradiation.
Grills IS; Yan D; Martinez AA; Vicini FA; Wong JW; Kestin LL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Nov; 57(3):875-90. PubMed ID: 14529795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of pancreatic cancer tumors with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using the volume at risk approach (VARA): employing dose-volume histogram (DVH) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) to evaluate small bowel toxicity.
Landry JC; Yang GY; Ting JY; Staley CA; Torres W; Esiashvili N; Davis LW
Med Dosim; 2002; 27(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 12074463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiobiological impact of planning techniques for prostate cancer in terms of tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability.
Rana S; Cheng C
Ann Med Health Sci Res; 2014 Mar; 4(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 24761232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comprehensive Comparison of Progressive Optimization Algorithm Based Automatic Plan and Manually Planned Treatment Technique for Cervical-Thoracic Esophageal Cancers.
Zhou Y; Xiang X; Xiong J; Gong C
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820973283. PubMed ID: 33176589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inverse and forward optimization of one- and two-dimensional intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based treatment of concave-shaped planning target volumes: the case of prostate cancer.
Corletto D; Iori M; Paiusco M; Brait L; Broggi S; Ceresoli G; Iotti C; Calandrino R; Fiorino C
Radiother Oncol; 2003 Feb; 66(2):185-95. PubMed ID: 12648791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiological characterizations of prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A single-institution review of ninety cases.
Khan MI; Jiang R; Kiciak A; Ur Rehman J; Afzal M; Chow JC
J Med Phys; 2016; 41(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 27651562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development and validation of an indigenous, radiobiological model-based tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probability estimation software for routine plan evaluation in clinics.
Patel G; Mandal A; Bharati A; Choudhary S; Mishra R; Mourya A
J Cancer Res Ther; 2022; 18(6):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 36412432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing conformal, arc radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in craniospinal irradiation planning.
Myers PA; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 15(5):4724. PubMed ID: 25207562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Postoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy in high risk prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison.
Digesú C; Cilla S; De Gaetano A; Massaccesi M; Macchia G; Ippolito E; Deodato F; Panunzi S; Iapalucci C; Mattiucci GC; D'Angelo E; Padula GD; Valentini V; Cellini N; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 20541394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. On the use of AAA and AcurosXB algorithms for three different stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) techniques: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT).
Tajaldeen A; Ramachandran P; Alghamdi S; Geso M
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2019; 24(4):399-408. PubMed ID: 31333334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of geometrical uncertainties on localized prostate radiotherapy of patients with bilateral metallic hip prostheses using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT: A planning study.
Soda R; Hatanaka S; Hariu M; Shimbo M; Yamano T; Nishimura K; Kondo S; Utsumi N; Takahashi T
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(2):243-254. PubMed ID: 31985486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
