153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37123093)
1. Exploratory Validation of Sleep-Tracking Devices in Patients with Psychiatric Disorders.
Ogasawara M; Takeshima M; Kosaka S; Imanishi A; Itoh Y; Fujiwara D; Yoshizawa K; Ozaki N; Nakagome K; Mishima K
Nat Sci Sleep; 2023; 15():301-312. PubMed ID: 37123093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR
Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of Four Commercial Wearable Sleep-Tracking Devices Tested Under Unrestricted Conditions at Home in Healthy Young Adults.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Jameson JT; Markwald RR
Nat Sci Sleep; 2022; 14():493-516. PubMed ID: 35345630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Polysomnography, Single-Channel Electroencephalogram, Fitbit, and Sleep Logs in Patients With Psychiatric Disorders: Cross-Sectional Study.
Kawai K; Iwamoto K; Miyata S; Okada I; Fujishiro H; Noda A; Nakagome K; Ozaki N; Ikeda M
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e51336. PubMed ID: 38090797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utility of the Fitbit Flex to evaluate sleep in major depressive disorder: A comparison against polysomnography and wrist-worn actigraphy.
Cook JD; Prairie ML; Plante DT
J Affect Disord; 2017 Aug; 217():299-305. PubMed ID: 28448949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three Contactless Sleep Technologies Compared With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in a Heterogeneous Group of Older Men and Women in a Model of Mild Sleep Disturbance: Sleep Laboratory Study.
G Ravindran KK; Della Monica C; Atzori G; Lambert D; Hassanin H; Revell V; Dijk DJ
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2023 Oct; 11():e46338. PubMed ID: 37878360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of a Commercial Accelerometer with Polysomnography and Actigraphy in Children and Adolescents.
Meltzer LJ; Hiruma LS; Avis K; Montgomery-Downs H; Valentin J
Sleep; 2015 Aug; 38(8):1323-30. PubMed ID: 26118555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research-grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In-lab validation against polysomnography.
Kahawage P; Jumabhoy R; Hamill K; de Zambotti M; Drummond SPA
J Sleep Res; 2020 Feb; 29(1):e12931. PubMed ID: 31626361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a multisensor smart ring to evaluate sleep: in-lab and home-based evaluation of generalized and personalized algorithms.
Grandner MA; Bromberg Z; Hadley A; Morrell Z; Graf A; Hutchison S; Freckleton D
Sleep; 2023 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 35767600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sleep assessment by means of a wrist actigraphy-based algorithm: agreement with polysomnography in an ambulatory study on older adults.
Regalia G; Gerboni G; Migliorini M; Lai M; Pham J; Puri N; Pavlova MK; Picard RW; Sarkis RA; Onorati F
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Mar; 38(3):400-414. PubMed ID: 33213222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of a device-agnostic approach to predict sleep from raw accelerometry data collected by Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4, and ActiGraph GT9X Link in children with sleep disruptions.
Weaver RG; de Zambotti M; White J; Finnegan O; Nelakuditi S; Zhu X; Burkart S; Beets M; Brown D; Pate RR; Welk GJ; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Armstrong B; Adams EL; Reesor-Oyer L; Pfledderer C; Dugger R; Bastyr M; von Klinggraeff L; Parker H
Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):417-429. PubMed ID: 37391280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Development and Accuracy of the THIM Wearable Device for Estimating Sleep and Wakefulness.
Scott H; Lovato N; Lack L
Nat Sci Sleep; 2021; 13():39-53. PubMed ID: 33469399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography.
Kainec KA; Caccavaro J; Barnes M; Hoff C; Berlin A; Spencer RMC
Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38276327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the Sleep-Wake Scoring of a New Wrist-Worn Sleep Monitoring Device.
Pigeon WR; Taylor M; Bui A; Oleynk C; Walsh P; Bishop TM
J Clin Sleep Med; 2018 Jun; 14(6):1057-1062. PubMed ID: 29852899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
