BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37123329)

  • 1. The Comparison of Survival Rates between Narrow Diameter Implants and Standard Diameter Implants: An Updated Meta-analysis.
    Ganji K; Rostamzadeh M; Talimkhani I; Moradi Y
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2023; 37():5. PubMed ID: 37123329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Narrow-diameter implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():21-40. PubMed ID: 30328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges-A retrospective study comparing narrow-diameter implants in pristine bone with standard-diameter implants in augmented bone.
    Schiegnitz E; Kämmerer PW; Hellwich P; König J; Sagheb K; Al-Nawas B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32(10):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 34224171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of survival rate and crestal bone loss of narrow diameter dental implants versus regular dental implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alrabiah M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2019 Feb; 10(1):e12367. PubMed ID: 30414262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Narrow- (3.0 mm) Versus Standard-Diameter (4.0 and 4.5 mm) Implants for Splinted Partial Fixed Restoration of Posterior Mandibular and Maxillary Jaws: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Pieri F; Forlivesi C; Caselli E; Corinaldesi G
    J Periodontol; 2017 Apr; 88(4):338-347. PubMed ID: 27858554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetic and functional outcomes of narrow-diameter implants compared in a cohort study to standard diameter implants in the anterior zone of the maxilla.
    Momberger N; Mukaddam K; Zitzmann NU; Bornstein MA; Filippi A; Kühl S
    Quintessence Int; 2022 May; 53(6):502-509. PubMed ID: 35380207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review on success of narrow-diameter dental implants.
    Klein MO; Schiegnitz E; Al-Nawas B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29 Suppl():43-54. PubMed ID: 24660189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical evaluation of narrow-diameter implants versus standard-diameter implants with lateral bone augmentation in posterior jaws: Three-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Zhang XM; Liu BL; Qian SJ; Shi JY; Zhang X; Lai HC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 Dec; 33(12):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 36203410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.
    Jung RE; Al-Nawas B; Araujo M; Avila-Ortiz G; Barter S; Brodala N; Chappuis V; Chen B; De Souza A; Almeida RF; Fickl S; Finelle G; Ganeles J; Gholami H; Hammerle C; Jensen S; Jokstad A; Katsuyama H; Kleinheinz J; Kunavisarut C; Mardas N; Monje A; Papaspyridakos P; Payer M; Schiegnitz E; Smeets R; Stefanini M; Ten Bruggenkate C; Vazouras K; Weber HP; Weingart D; Windisch P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():69-77. PubMed ID: 30328189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mini-implants and narrow diameter implants as mandibular overdenture retainers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes.
    Marcello-Machado RM; Faot F; Schuster AJ; Nascimento GG; Del Bel Cury AA
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Feb; 45(2):161-183. PubMed ID: 29125652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does a history of periodontal disease affect implant survival?
    Young L; Grant R; Brown T; Lamont T
    Evid Based Dent; 2021 Jan; 22(1):24-25. PubMed ID: 33772127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of implant diameter on its survival: a meta-analysis based on prospective clinical trials.
    Ortega-Oller I; Suárez F; Galindo-Moreno P; Torrecillas-Martínez L; Monje A; Catena A; Wang HL
    J Periodontol; 2014 Apr; 85(4):569-80. PubMed ID: 23905841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Narrow Diameter Dental Implants as an Alternative Treatment for Atrophic Alveolar Ridges. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    González-Valls G; Roca-Millan E; Céspedes-Sánchez JM; González-Navarro B; Torrejon-Moya A; López-López J
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Jun; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 34208369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Narrow-diameter implants versus regular-diameter implants for rehabilitation of the anterior region: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Cruz RS; Lemos CAA; de Batista VES; Yogui FC; Oliveira HFF; Verri FR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 50(5):674-682. PubMed ID: 33158693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Survival analysis of wide dental implant: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee CT; Chen YW; Starr JR; Chuang SK
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1251-1264. PubMed ID: 26705937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survival rate of titanium-zirconium narrow diameter dental implants versus commercially pure titanium narrow diameter dental implants: A systematic review.
    Iegami CM; Uehara PN; Sesma N; Pannuti CM; Tortamano Neto P; Mukai MK
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 19(6):1015-1022. PubMed ID: 28853215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How successful are small-diameter implants? A literature review.
    Sohrabi K; Mushantat A; Esfandiari S; Feine J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 May; 23(5):515-25. PubMed ID: 22313216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The association between the multiple birth and breast cancer incidence: an update of a systematic review and meta-analysis from 1983 to 2022.
    Veisi P; Nikouei M; Cheraghi M; Shahgheibi S; Moradi Y
    Arch Public Health; 2023 Apr; 81(1):76. PubMed ID: 37106433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.