These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37125691)

  • 1. Building Machine Learning Small Molecule Melting Points and Solubility Models Using CCDC Melting Points Dataset.
    Zhu X; Polyakov VR; Bajjuri K; Hu H; Maderna A; Tovee CA; Ward SC
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 May; 63(10):2948-2959. PubMed ID: 37125691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting Melting Points of Organic Molecules: Applications to Aqueous Solubility Prediction Using the General Solubility Equation.
    McDonagh JL; van Mourik T; Mitchell JB
    Mol Inform; 2015 Nov; 34(11-12):715-24. PubMed ID: 27491032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Capturing the crystal: prediction of enthalpy of sublimation, crystal lattice energy, and melting points of organic compounds.
    Salahinejad M; Le TC; Winkler DA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):223-9. PubMed ID: 23215043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intrinsic molecular volume as a measure of the cavity term in linear solvation energy relationships: octanol-water partition coefficients and aqueous solubilities.
    Leahy DE
    J Pharm Sci; 1986 Jul; 75(7):629-36. PubMed ID: 3761161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "Flexible-Acceptor" General Solubility Equation for beyond Rule of 5 Drugs.
    Avdeef A; Kansy M
    Mol Pharm; 2020 Oct; 17(10):3930-3940. PubMed ID: 32787270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Solubility profiles of some isoxazolyl-naphthoquinone derivatives.
    Granero G; de Bertorello MM; Briñón MC
    Int J Pharm; 1999 Nov; 190(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 10528095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why are some properties more difficult to predict than others? A study of QSPR models of solubility, melting point, and Log P.
    Hughes LD; Palmer DS; Nigsch F; Mitchell JB
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):220-32. PubMed ID: 18186622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of the aqueous solubility: comparison of the general solubility equation and the method using an amended solvation energy relationship.
    Yang G; Ran Y; Yalkowsky SH
    J Pharm Sci; 2002 Feb; 91(2):517-33. PubMed ID: 11835210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid method for the estimation of octanol/water partition coefficient (log P(oct)) from gradient RP-HPLC retention and a hydrogen bond acidity term (zetaalpha(2)(H)).
    Valko K; My Du C; Bevan C; Reynolds DP; Abraham MH
    Curr Med Chem; 2001 Jul; 8(9):1137-46. PubMed ID: 11472245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of aqueous solubility from SCRATCH.
    Jain P; Yalkowsky SH
    Int J Pharm; 2010 Jan; 385(1-2):1-5. PubMed ID: 19819319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative structure-property relationship of aromatic sulfur-containing carboxylates.
    Liu XH; Yang ZF; Wang LS
    J Environ Sci (China); 2003 Nov; 15(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 14758887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol-water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory.
    Tielker N; Tomazic D; Eberlein L; Güssregen S; Kast SM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2020 Apr; 34(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 31981015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Scores of extended connectivity fingerprint as descriptors in QSPR study of melting point and aqueous solubility.
    Zhou D; Alelyunas Y; Liu R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):981-7. PubMed ID: 18465850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hydrogen bonding. 32. An analysis of water-octanol and water-alkane partitioning and the delta log P parameter of seiler.
    Abraham MH; Chadha HS; Whiting GS; Mitchell RC
    J Pharm Sci; 1994 Aug; 83(8):1085-100. PubMed ID: 7983591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of octanol/water partition coefficients using parameters derived from molecular structures.
    Sasaki Y; Kubodera H; Matuszaki T; Umeyama H
    J Pharmacobiodyn; 1991 Apr; 14(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 1658294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comments on prediction of the aqueous solubility using the general solubility equation (GSE) versus a genetic algorithm and a support vector machine model.
    Alantary D; Yalkowsky S
    Pharm Dev Technol; 2018 Sep; 23(7):739-740. PubMed ID: 28425310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of structure-activity relationships derived from two methods for estimating octanol-water partition coefficients.
    Cash GG; Clements RG
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1996; 5(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 8751818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Octanol/water partition coefficient of ortho-substituted aromatic solutes.
    Sotomatsu T; Shigemura M; Murata Y; Fujita T
    J Pharm Sci; 1993 Aug; 82(8):776-81. PubMed ID: 8377112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The solubility of liquid and solid compounds in dry octan-1-ol.
    Abraham MH; Acree WE
    Chemosphere; 2014 May; 103():26-34. PubMed ID: 24290301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. QSPR studies on water solubility, octanol-water partition coefficient and vapour pressure of pesticides.
    Duchowicz PR
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Feb; 31(2):135-148. PubMed ID: 31842624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.