These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37126970)

  • 21. Coupling intention and actions of vehicle-pedestrian interaction: A virtual reality experiment study.
    Dang M; Jin Y; Hang P; Crosato L; Sun Y; Wei C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Aug; 203():107639. PubMed ID: 38763064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Roles of individual differences and traffic environment factors on children's street-crossing behaviour in a VR environment.
    Wang H; Gao Z; Shen T; Li F; Xu J; Schwebel DC
    Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 26(5):417-423. PubMed ID: 31473596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Illegal road crossing behavior of pedestrians at overpass locations: Factors affecting gap acceptance, crossing times and overpass use.
    Demiroz YI; Onelcin P; Alver Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jul; 80():220-8. PubMed ID: 25916663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. External Human-Machine Interfaces for Autonomous Vehicles from Pedestrians' Perspective: A Survey Study.
    Guo J; Yuan Q; Yu J; Chen X; Yu W; Cheng Q; Wang W; Luo W; Jiang X
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Apr; 22(9):. PubMed ID: 35591029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Overestimated time-to-collision for quiet vehicles: Evidence from a study using a novel audiovisual virtual-reality system for traffic scenarios.
    Oberfeld D; Wessels M; Büttner D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 175():106778. PubMed ID: 35878469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Improving the experience in the pedestrian's interaction with an autonomous vehicle: An ergonomic comparison of external HMI.
    Métayer N; Coeugnet S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103478. PubMed ID: 34116413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Understanding complex traffic road scenes: The case of child-pedestrians' hazard perception.
    Meir A; Oron-Gilad T
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():111-126. PubMed ID: 32199554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Street crossing behavior in younger and older pedestrians: an eye- and head-tracking study.
    Zito GA; Cazzoli D; Scheffler L; Jäger M; Müri RM; Mosimann UP; Nyffeler T; Mast FW; Nef T
    BMC Geriatr; 2015 Dec; 15():176. PubMed ID: 26714495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Examining pedestrians' trust in automated vehicles based on attributes of trust: A qualitative study.
    Zhou S; Sun X; Wang Q; Liu B; Burnett G
    Appl Ergon; 2023 May; 109():103997. PubMed ID: 36774764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Interactions between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks considering occlusions by opposing vehicles.
    Zhu H; Iryo-Asano M; Alhajyaseen WKM; Nakamura H; Dias C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106468. PubMed ID: 34773785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of Pedestrian Street-Crossing Decision-Making Based on Vehicle Deceleration-Safety Gap.
    Zhang H; Guo Y; Chen Y; Sun Q; Wang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 17(24):. PubMed ID: 33321945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pedestrian Trust in Automated Vehicles: Role of Traffic Signal and AV Driving Behavior.
    Jayaraman SK; Creech C; Tilbury DM; Yang XJ; Pradhan AK; Tsui KM; Robert LP
    Front Robot AI; 2019; 6():117. PubMed ID: 33501132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective.
    Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experiential exposure to texting and walking in virtual reality: A randomized trial to reduce distracted pedestrian behavior.
    Schwebel DC; McClure LA; Porter BE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():116-122. PubMed ID: 28279843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of perceived pedestrian safety on designing safer built environments.
    Aceves-González C; Ekambaram K; Rey-Galindo J; Rizo-Corona L
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S84-S89. PubMed ID: 32926653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of pedestrian characteristics and their road crossing behaviors on driver yielding behavior at controlled intersections.
    Zafri NM; Tabassum T; Himal MRH; Sultana R; Debnath AK
    J Safety Res; 2022 Jun; 81():1-8. PubMed ID: 35589279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks.
    Imanishimwe D; Kumar A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Virtual testing of speed reduction schemes on urban collector roads.
    Domenichini L; Branzi V; Meocci M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():38-51. PubMed ID: 29101788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The 'invisible gorilla' during pedestrian-AV interaction: Effects of secondary tasks on pedestrians' reaction to eHMIs.
    Zhao X; Li X; Rakotonirainy A; Bourgeois-Bougrine S; Gruyer D; Delhomme P
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107246. PubMed ID: 37597379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.