BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37127244)

  • 1. Sex and Gender Reporting in Rehabilitation Research: A Commentary.
    Colantonio A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2023 Aug; 104(8):1356-1358. PubMed ID: 37127244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Integration of Sex and Gender Considerations Into Biomedical Research: Lessons From International Funding Agencies.
    White J; Tannenbaum C; Klinge I; Schiebinger L; Clayton J
    J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Sep; 106(10):3034-3048. PubMed ID: 34137862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reporting Guideline for RULER: Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research: Explanation and Elaboration.
    Van de Winckel A; Kozlowski AJ; Johnston MV; Weaver J; Grampurohit N; Terhorst L; Juengst S; Ehrlich-Jones L; Heinemann AW; Melvin J; Sood P; Mallinson T
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 103(7):1487-1498. PubMed ID: 35436496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond sex and gender difference in funding and reporting of health research.
    Hankivsky O; Springer KW; Hunting G
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2018; 3():6. PubMed ID: 30167330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER): the RULER Statement.
    Mallinson T; Kozlowski AJ; Johnston MV; Weaver J; Terhorst L; Grampurohit N; Juengst S; Ehrlich-Jones L; Heinemann AW; Melvin J; Sood P; Van de Winckel A
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 103(7):1477-1486. PubMed ID: 35421395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review: issues in physical medicine and rehabilitation.
    Wagner AK; Boninger ML; Levy C; Chan L; Gater D; Kirby RL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Oct; 82(10):790-802. PubMed ID: 14508411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Essential metrics for assessing sex & gender integration in health research proposals involving human participants.
    Day S; Mason R; Tannenbaum C; Rochon PA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182812. PubMed ID: 28854192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER): reporting guidelines as a framework of innovation for an equitable approach to gender medicine. Commentary.
    De Castro P; Heidari S; Babor TF
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2016; 52(2):154-7. PubMed ID: 27364388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
    Frontera WR; Grimby G; Basford J; Muller D; Ring H
    Disabil Rehabil; 2008; 30(7):487-92. PubMed ID: 18365863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
    Frontera WR; Grimby G; Basford J; Müller D; Ring H
    J Rehabil Med; 2008 Mar; 40(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 18292915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publishing in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
    Frontera WR; Grimby G; Basford J; Muller D; Ring H
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2008 Mar; 87(3):215-20. PubMed ID: 18287818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science?
    Cavanaugh C; Abu Hussein Y
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2020; 5():14. PubMed ID: 33110629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].
    Heidari S; Babor TF; De Castro P; Tort S; Curno M
    Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(2):203-210. PubMed ID: 29731296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018.
    Pina DG; Buljan I; Hren D; Marušić A
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33439120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness.
    Gallo SA; Schmaling KB; Thompson LA; Glisson SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Mar; 27(2):18. PubMed ID: 33733708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices.
    Conix S; De Block A; Vaesen K
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():1126. PubMed ID: 35186273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using peer review to improve research and promote collaboration.
    Kupfer DJ; Murphree AN; Pilkonis PA; Cameron JL; Giang RT; Dodds NE; Godard KA; Lewis DA
    Acad Psychiatry; 2014 Feb; 38(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 24449224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].
    Heidari S; Babor TF; Castro P; Tort S; Curno M
    Epidemiol Serv Saude; 2017; 26(3):665-675. PubMed ID: 28443945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.
    Sugimoto CR; Ahn YY; Smith E; Macaluso B; Larivière V
    Lancet; 2019 Feb; 393(10171):550-559. PubMed ID: 30739690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using a Virtual Community (the Health Equity Learning Collaboratory) to Support Early-Stage Investigators Pursuing Grant Funding.
    Hall M; Engler J; Hemming J; Alema-Mensah E; Baez A; Lawson K; Quarshie A; Stiles J; Pemu P; Thompson W; Paulsen D; Smith A; Ofili E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30380777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.