These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37127401)

  • 1. Task-Relevant Smartphone Messages Within Work Zones: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Craig CM; Tian D; Morris NL
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jun; 66(6):1786-1797. PubMed ID: 37127401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiovisual presentation of variable message signs improves message processing in distracted drivers during partially automated driving.
    Pi-Ruano M; Roca J; Tejero P
    J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():172-180. PubMed ID: 38858040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver distraction by smartphone use (WhatsApp) in different age groups.
    Ortiz C; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Castro JJ; Casares-López M; Salas C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():239-249. PubMed ID: 29723735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-vehicle warnings for work zone and related rear-end collisions: A driving simulator experiment.
    Hang J; Yan X; Li X; Duan K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106768. PubMed ID: 35820314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reading text while driving: understanding drivers' strategic and tactical adaptation to distraction.
    Liang Y; Horrey WJ; Hoffman JD
    Hum Factors; 2015 Mar; 57(2):347-59. PubMed ID: 25850162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing driving behavior upstream of work zones by detecting response points in speed profile: A naturalistic driving study.
    Thapa R; Hallmark S; Smadi O; Goswamy A
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):854-859. PubMed ID: 31647333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does wearable device bring distraction closer to drivers? Comparing smartphones and Google Glass.
    He J; McCarley JS; Crager K; Jadliwala M; Hua L; Huang S
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():156-166. PubMed ID: 29866306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance-oriented advanced curve speed warning system in a connected vehicle environment.
    Wang S; Wang Y; Zheng Q; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105801. PubMed ID: 33128990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In the eye of the beholder: A simulator study of the impact of Google Glass on driving performance.
    Young KL; Stephens AN; Stephan KL; Stuart GW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Jan; 86():68-75. PubMed ID: 26519889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of self-regulation in the context of driver distraction: A simulator study.
    Wandtner B; Schumacher M; Schmidt EA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):472-9. PubMed ID: 27082493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gender differences in the effectiveness of public education messages aimed at smartphone use among young drivers.
    Gauld CS; Lewis IM; White KM; Watson BC; Rose CT; Fleiter JJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(2):127-132. PubMed ID: 32154732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of texting on driving performance in a driving simulator: the influence of driver age.
    Rumschlag G; Palumbo T; Martin A; Head D; George R; Commissaris RL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jan; 74():145-9. PubMed ID: 25463954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Google glass: a driver distraction cause or cure?
    Sawyer BD; Finomore VS; Calvo AA; Hancock PA
    Hum Factors; 2014 Nov; 56(7):1307-21. PubMed ID: 25490810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-modal demands of a smartphone used to place calls and enter addresses during highway driving relative to two embedded systems.
    Reimer B; Mehler B; Reagan I; Kidd D; Dobres J
    Ergonomics; 2016 Dec; 59(12):1565-1585. PubMed ID: 27110964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driver behavior in use of guide and logo signs under distraction and complex roadway conditions.
    Kaber D; Pankok C; Corbett B; Ma W; Hummer J; Rasdorf W
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():99-106. PubMed ID: 25479979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vehicle emission implications of drivers' smart advisory system for traffic operations in work zones.
    Li Q; Qiao F; Yu L
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 May; 66(5):446-55. PubMed ID: 26756853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of smartphone apps while driving: Variations on driving performances and perceived risks.
    Perez J; Hyun K; Boni JA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107474. PubMed ID: 38290408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of brief visual interruption tasks on drivers' ability to resume their visual search for a pre-cued hazard.
    Borowsky A; Horrey WJ; Liang Y; Garabet A; Simmons L; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Aug; 93():207-216. PubMed ID: 27209155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eye movement as a function to explore the effects of improved signs design and audio warning on drivers' behavior at STOP-sign-controlled grade crossings.
    Liu R; Yan X; Ma S; Xue Q
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106693. PubMed ID: 35552119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploratory Development of Algorithms for Determining Driver Attention Status.
    Herbers E; Miller M; Neurauter L; Walters J; Glaser D
    Hum Factors; 2024 Sep; 66(9):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 37732402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.